On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:26 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Zach Dennis > > As you mentioned David,
> "Plain text is great for some situations, but
> > so is writing in Ruby". This begs the question now that we have plain
> > text stories
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Kero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I was working on a past project tonight to trunk which is using the
> > > > old story format. IE:
> > > > Given "desc" do / end
> > > > Wh
yes, thank you very much!
On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Feb 21, 10:40 am, Anthony Broad-Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am testing an action on a controller and cannot seem to find the
>> syntax to stub a method call off of the controller I am testing.
>>
>>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Kero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was working on a past project tonight to trunk which is using the
> > > old story format. IE:
> > > Given "desc" do / end
> > > When "someting "do /end
> > > etc..
> > >
> > > Is this officially supported, or is t
On Feb 21, 10:40 am, Anthony Broad-Crawford wrote:
> I am testing an action on a controller and cannot seem to find the
> syntax to stub a method call off of the controller I am testing.
>
> pseudo code
>
> class SomeController < < ApplicationController
>
> def some_action
>
>
I try to thing of the audience for the work, and it keeps me sane.
Stories are to make sure you're holding up your contract with the
client or user. They are high level, and don't deal with any
implementation details that can be abstracted away. You might relate
them to acceptance tests, be
I am testing an action on a controller and cannot seem to find the
syntax to stub a method call off of the controller I am testing.
pseudo code
class SomeController < < ApplicationController
def some_action
stuff
stuff
stuff
On 2/21/08, Chuck Remes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While practicing BDD on my first-ever BDD project, I have come to a
> point where it makes sense to change my original class to an abstract
> class and create one (or more) concrete subclasses that implement a
> specific method. What is the ri
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:21 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Joe Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:39 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Feb 16, 2008 1:21 PM, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
While practicing BDD on my first-ever BDD project, I have come to a
point where it makes sense to change my original class to an abstract
class and create one (or more) concrete subclasses that implement a
specific method. What is the right way to restructure the tests in
this scenario? Do
Hi All,
I'm just getting into Rspec and have a couple questions to get my head
around this:
1- Testing web services: is this a good fit for User Stories?
2- The web services run on ActionWebServices, should I be doing
additional testing using traditional Rspec/Rails integration (I don't
know if I
Hi David
I have that option set already, and i'm not using any fixtures in
spec_helper. My spec helper looks like this: is it the
use_instantiated_fixtures option perhaps? (i don't know what that does).
thanks, max
ENV["RAILS_ENV"] = "test"
requ
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Joe Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:39 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 2008 1:21 PM, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:13:51 +, Steve wrote:
> > > > What was the natu
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Max Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a fixture for one of my tables that i use in some model tests. The
> data in it is messing up some other tests for a different model, that
> doesn't ask for the fixture - isn't the fixture data supposed to be cleared
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Jed Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahh, I see. Is Spec::Runner::QuietBacktraceTweaker configurable for more
> quietness?
Nope.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 1:39 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 19, 2008 4:16 AM, Jed H
I have a fixture for one of my tables that i use in some model tests. The
data in it is messing up some other tests for a different model, that
doesn't ask for the fixture - isn't the fixture data supposed to be cleared
out of the test db in between tests, and only be present if specifically
asked
Hi.
I've created a Google Group 'rspec' that acts as a mirror to the RSpec-
users mailing list.
You can find the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rspec.
lg
-- andreas
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mai
17 matches
Mail list logo
