On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Ben Mabey b...@benmabey.com wrote:
On 12/27/08 1:08 AM, Mischa Fierer wrote:
As some of us have been using cucumber for quite a while now, I may not be
the only one wishing his many steps ran a bit faster.
Let's try to put together a quick FAQ for people
If this is a bug I'll submit a ticket.
Or, maybe I'd doing something wrong.
Using a Cucumber FIT Step Table, the scenario runs and passes (and
fails when i put bad data in the table). But the console output only
shows the Step text, not the table so when I read the output it's not
telling
I think this is not yet implemented. I had the same issue and was told
they are working on it but that they are doing a big refactoring so
might not be in 0.1.13 yet
To work around that issues. I created a helper method that can print
the table in one line or multiple line. Then call the
could you pastie an example?
On Dec 28, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Emmanuel Pinault wrote:
I think this is not yet implemented. I had the same issue and was
told they are working on it but that they are doing a big
refactoring so might not be in 0.1.13 yet
To work around that issues. I created a
Hi,
I have exampled Cucumber and FireWatir here:
http://code.google.com/p/cucumber-and-watir/
FireWatir will run on Windows, OSX and GNU\Linux.
It is on google-code as I am unfamiliar with git.
Regards
Aidy
___
rspec-users mailing list
Hi,
Could someone help me resolve this conflict:
Then the selected item should have a label tag with Foo:
Multiple step definitions match the selected item should have a
label tag with \Foo:\: (Cucumber::Multiple)
features/step_definitions/page_builder_steps.rb:355:in `/^the
Are the steps doing anything different? I mean it seems like selected|
first|second are part of .* so you can put that specific logic in the
step I would thing and have one step to handle them all
Or then just change slightly your sentence so they don t overlap
Emmanuel
On Dec 28,
something like
Given I do something with the following param |Key1|value1|, |Key2|
Value2|
|Key1|value1|
|Key2|Value2|
Then your step could look like
Given 'I do something with the following .*' do | table|
// your logic
end
Emmanuel
On Dec 28, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jonathan Linowes
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Jonathan Linowes
jonat...@parkerhill.com wrote:
Perhaps tell it to ignore any matches with item in it, but dont know how
It's called a zero-width negative lookahead, and it looks like this:
/^the (?!\w+ item)(.*) should have a \(.*)\ tag with (.*)/
I didn't
