On 15 Jan 2009, at 22:13, James Byrne wrote:
We have, in consequence, gone through and removed the term login from
all code use as well; replacing it with authenticate. So, for
example,
the authentication form now says: To Proceed Please Authenticate
Yourself
I am sometimes (ok, mostly)
On 16 Jan 2009, at 06:58, Scott Taylor wrote:
s.ross wrote:
On Jan 15, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Mike Gaffney wrote:
s.ross's email about Screw.Unit brought prompted me to ask this
question:
1) What do you use for Javascript Unit testing?
I've tried jsspec and Screw.Unit and so far I'm
Hi Guys,
2009/1/15 aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Mischa Fierer f.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
While I agree that ie6 must die, the fix required to make it work sounds
minimal in this case. I may be wrong.
Perhaps, Aidy, you would be interested in
Ok.
I have solved my problem.
Because I am using spanish for wrinting my features, I didn't paste the
exact sentences of the code I was using, and pasted instead a
manual-translated similar code.
And nobody could see the problem. Never more.
The problem was that I was writing the block for
I'm new to rspec and looking for way to test a validation I added to a model.
The test checks to see that if field1 has a value then field2 must be nil
and vice versa.
---
When I did the rspec_scaffold it generated one test which worked
before :each do
On 15 jan 2009, at 23:24, Joseph Wilk wrote:
Bart Zonneveld wrote:
Hey all,
I've read http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/3-%20%20create-givenscenario-dependency-accross-feature-file
, and would like to share another idea about this.
I'm building a blog at the
We're trying to get one of them up at work and we're currently adding
selenium grid support to webrat. I was thinking of building a glue
plugin on one of these frameworks so that they would just run as a
webrat test via a rake task. Would anyone be interested in somthing like
that if we
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.com
wrote:
Here are my questions:
- What does the returns(Episode.all) mean?
Okay I get it now. Thank you very much.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Ken Wegener kgwco...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm new to rspec and looking for way to test a validation I added to a model.
The test checks to see that if field1 has a value then field2 must be nil
and vice versa.
---
When I did the
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
If you're on Rails and use RSpec matchers, the latest official
webrat 0.3.4 gem is broken. It doesn't contain the webrat/rspec-rails.rb
file (a packaging bug).
If you feel adventurous then, after installing cucumber-0.3.4, you could
create a file with this content:
I have very little experience with Ruby. I am using RSpec to test a
cross platform C++ library. I am using a shell script (and batch file)
to run the tests with several different compilers.
I do no want to put the details of the different compilers in the RSpec
files, but am thinking about
I am working on our (newly renamed) authentication feature. The current
scenario is:
Scenario: Non-administrators should not set administrator ability
Given I have no users
And I add a user named admin as an administrator
And I add a user named myuser as not an administrator
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:59 AM, James Byrne li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
If you're on Rails and use RSpec matchers, the latest official
webrat 0.3.4 gem is broken. It doesn't contain the webrat/rspec-rails.rb
file (a packaging bug).
If you feel adventurous then, after
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:00 AM, James Byrne li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
I am working on our (newly renamed) authentication feature. The current
scenario is:
Scenario: Non-administrators should not set administrator ability
Given I have no users
And I add a user named admin as an
Solved my problem all the examples I could find had the following example
myTest.should_not_be_valid
but that method wasn't a valid method.
It appears the method has been refactored and the new form is
mytest.should_not(be_valid) which does work
following test does what I want
it should not
James Byrne wrote:
Now, what I am looking for is an example of how an authenticated user
would craft a post request in their browser to set the
user.administrator flag to true.
OK, I figured out how to do this, as an authenticated user, from the
browser. I am now going to try the syntax
Pat Maddox wrote:
I assume you don't though, cause that'd be kinda weird. How about
passing it in the POST params:
put users_url(user), :user = {:administrator = true}
Something along those lines...
That is the problem, I am not sure what syntax to use int the step
definition. I tried
Hi
Before I try to recreate this, does anyone know what generally causes
this in a progress spec run?
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
rspec-1.1.12/lib/spec/runner/formatter/progress_bar_formatter.rb:25:in
`flush': Bad file descriptor (Errno::EBADF)
from
Hi,
I just run in the following problem when starting a Rails app on my
production server:
You have rspec rake tasks installed in
/home/thomas/rails_apps/video_on_demand/lib/tasks/rspec.rake,
but rspec can not be found in vendor/gems, vendor/plugins or on the
system.
Obviously I don't
On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi,
I just run in the following problem when starting a Rails app on my
production server:
You have rspec rake tasks installed in
/home/thomas/rails_apps/video_on_demand/lib/tasks/rspec.rake,
but rspec can not be found in vendor/gems,
In the past we've done the following:
Story: Users without hierarchy manager role accessing the hierarchy
In order to ensure users that shouldn't have access to the hierarchy don't
As a user who isn't a hierarchy manager
I should not be able to access the hierarchy
Scenario: Non
On 16 Jan 2009, at 17:44, Ed Keith wrote:
I have very little experience with Ruby. I am using RSpec to test a
cross platform C++ library. I am using a shell script (and batch file)
to run the tests with several different compilers.
I do no want to put the details of the different compilers in
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Hi,
I just run in the following problem when starting a Rails app on my
production server:
You have rspec rake tasks installed in
/home/thomas/rails_apps/video_on_demand/lib/tasks/rspec.rake,
but rspec can not
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Wegener Ken kgwco...@yahoo.com wrote:
Solved my problem all the examples I could find had the following example
myTest.should_not_be_valid
but that method wasn't a valid method.
It appears the method has been refactored and the new form is
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:05 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.com
wrote:
Hi,
I just run in the following problem when starting a Rails app on my
production server:
You have rspec rake tasks installed in
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
A quick fix is to install rspec and rspec-rails gems on production
server, but I don't get why the app wants them installed.
Because every Rake file in /lib gets loaded when you run Rake. That's
your dependency
Nicholas Wieland wrote:
Does someone have an example on faking a file upload for just ensuring
it gets called, without actually uploading the file to s3.
I thought that stubbing Model.has_attached_file would be enough, but
it doesn't seem so ...
This is what I did:
Video.stub!(
Just as an addendum to that, it also exhibits freezing behaviour on
one of the specs (presumably the same) with just the one line in
place. (It just hangs indefinitely during the progress output.)
Don't expect anyone will be able to figure this out without seeing all
the code, so I'm
I would delete that rake task file (lib/rspec.rake) if you don't have
rspec installed.
Scott
I run rspec on my dev machine, but obviously not on my production
machine, what would be the nicest way to handle such scenario? At the
top of rspec.rake I could add a check on the environment, I
Zach Dennis wrote:
The Then step ensures that the user is redirected to an access
denied page. Granted, this doesn't go the granularity you may be
trying to get at, but knowing you aren't actually getting through to
the underlying action (by being redirected to the access denied page)
has
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.comwrote:
I run rspec on my dev machine, but obviously not on my production
machine, what would be the nicest way to handle such scenario? At the
top of rspec.rake I could add a check on the environment
That would get my vote.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:25 PM, James Byrne li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Pat Maddox wrote:
I assume you don't though, cause that'd be kinda weird. How about
passing it in the POST params:
put users_url(user), :user = {:administrator = true}
Something along those lines...
That is the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Mark Wilden m...@mwilden.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.com
wrote:
I run rspec on my dev machine, but obviously not on my production
machine, what would be the nicest way to handle such scenario? At the
top of
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:15 PM, aslak hellesoy
aslak.helle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:05 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.com
wrote:
Hi,
I just run in the following problem when
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Manasi Vora li...@ruby-forum.com
wrote:
I am using webrat 0.3.2 cucumber 0.1.13 activerecord 2.1.1
You need a newer webrat - for example gem install aslakhellesoy-webrat
Aslak
Thanks that help me out. It installed 0.3.2.2 which
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:15 PM, aslak hellesoy
aslak.helle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:05 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Fernando Perez
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:19 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.comwrote:
I run rspec on my dev machine, but obviously not on my production
machine, what would be the nicest way to handle such scenario? At the
top of rspec.rake I could add a check on the environment
That would get
On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
I would delete that rake task file (lib/rspec.rake) if you don't have
rspec installed.
Scott
I run rspec on my dev machine, but obviously not on my production
machine, what would be the nicest way to handle such scenario? At the
top of
On 2009-01-16, at 17:19, Fernando Perez wrote:
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Manasi Vora li...@ruby-forum.com
wrote:
I am using webrat 0.3.2 cucumber 0.1.13 activerecord 2.1.1
You need a newer webrat - for example gem install aslakhellesoy-
webrat
Aslak
On 2009-01-16, at 17:42, Fernando Perez wrote:
Nicholas Wieland wrote:
Does someone have an example on faking a file upload for just
ensuring
it gets called, without actually uploading the file to s3.
I thought that stubbing Model.has_attached_file would be enough, but
it doesn't seem so ...
40 matches
Mail list logo
