Is it possible to mix a normal parameter argument for a step, with
tabular data?
Something like this:
Given there is a country Spain with the cities:
|name |
|Madrid|
|Barcelona |
|Valencia |
And this step_definition
Given /^there is a country Spain with the cities:$/ do
Yes, that should work. But you'd have to do
Given /^there is a country (.*) with the cities:$/ do |country_name,
cities_table|
...
end
Erik
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Juanma Cervera li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
Is it possible to mix a normal parameter argument for a step, with
tabular
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Erik Pukinskis
erikpukins...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that should work. But you'd have to do
Given /^there is a country (.*) with the cities:$/ do |country_name,
cities_table|
...
end
Correct. And it's documented in the Wiki:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:29 PM, aslak hellesoy
aslak.helle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Erik Pukinskis
erikpukins...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that should work. But you'd have to do
Given /^there is a country (.*) with the cities:$/ do |country_name,
cities_table|
I am working in an scenario and it's still failing. I have not yet
finished it.
And I am running it constantly with the cucumber command, not with rake.
The problem is that it's not working with the database in a transaction,
and I have to run 'rake db:test:prepare' manually between two
Aslak
The documentation in this wiki is the best I have ever seen, and it's
constantly being improved.
Very good job
and thanks.
Juanma
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Juanma Cervera wrote:
I am working in an scenario and it's still failing. I have not yet
finished it.
And I am running it constantly with the cucumber command, not with rake.
The problem is that it's not working with the database in a transaction,
and I have to run 'rake db:test:prepare'
Woops, sorry I meant:
@@@
Cucumber::Rails.use_transactional_fixtures
@@@
Joseph Wilk wrote:
Juanma Cervera wrote:
I am working in an scenario and it's still failing. I have not yet
finished it.
And I am running it constantly with the cucumber command, not with rake.
The problem is that it's
Joseph Wilk wrote:
Woops, sorry I meant:
@@@
Cucumber::Rails.use_transactional_fixtures
@@@
Joseph, thanks for the reply.
I do have Cucumber::Rails.use_transactional_fixtures in env.rb
I have verified it failing when setting the database in the new
background section of the feature.
In
For now I am running this command (together)
rake db:test:prepare cucumber -r features -l es
features/reservas/creacion_reserva.feature
Juanma
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Ben Mabey wrote:
Juanma Cervera wrote:
Joseph Wilk wrote:
Woops, sorry I meant:
@@@
Cucumber::Rails.use_transactional_fixtures
@@@
Joseph, thanks for the reply.
I do have Cucumber::Rails.use_transactional_fixtures in env.rb
I have verified it failing when setting the database in
I have just gone to Pragmatic Programmers and spent my money in the
book I have dreaming for six months. :)
Maybe I'm the first :)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
I’m pleased to announce the beta release of the Pragmatic Bookshelf’s
The RSpec Book: Behaviour Driven Development with RSpec, Cucumber and
Friends!
It’s been a long time coming, and there’s still a lot of work to do to
get to print. The beta release has 9 of the 22 chapters we have
No, you're not ;P
Hope it's really launched in April \o/
-
Maurício Linhares
http://alinhavado.wordpress.com/ (pt-br) | http://blog.codevader.com/ (en)
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Juanma Cervera li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
I have just gone to Pragmatic Programmers and spent my money in
On 29/01/2009, at 10:36 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
I’m pleased to announce the beta release of the Pragmatic
Bookshelf’s The RSpec Book: Behaviour Driven Development with RSpec,
Cucumber and Friends!
It’s been a long time coming, and there’s still a lot of work to do
to get to print. The
Just did the same :)
Juanma Cervera wrote:
I have just gone to Pragmatic Programmers and spent my money in the
book I have dreaming for six months. :)
Maybe I'm the first :)
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Nick Hoffman n...@deadorange.com wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 10:36 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the beta release of the Pragmatic Bookshelf's The
RSpec Book: Behaviour Driven Development with RSpec, Cucumber and Friends!
It's been a long
Dang, I tried to create a spiffy new application and ended up with a
strangely shaped farm implement instead.
8)
Nice work guys.
Sincerely,
T
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Erik Terpstra e...@solidcode.net wrote:
Just did the same :)
Juanma Cervera wrote:
I have just gone to Pragmatic
Just bought it -- been looking forwards to this!
2009/1/29 David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Nick Hoffman n...@deadorange.com wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 10:36 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the beta release of the Pragmatic Bookshelf's
Hi all,
I've found myself writing a thing I think is less than optimal, looking for
suggestions. The context is, I'm testing a result, and as a part of that test,
I might verify two or three things, which are individually relevant but not
really discrete results (?).
Here's my thinking
Even if this is a bug, it's a pretty obscure one. It was frustrating
the hell out of me until I found a workaround, so I thought I'd just
post the details:
Given a find like this:
def self.find_old
User.all(:conditions = ['updated_at = ?',Time.now - 1.day)
...
Trying to set a message
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:08 PM, tatyree t...@snappl.co.uk wrote:
Even if this is a bug, it's a pretty obscure one. It was frustrating
the hell out of me until I found a workaround, so I thought I'd just
post the details:
Given a find like this:
def self.find_old
User.all(:conditions =
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM, tatyree t...@snappl.co.uk wrote:
Even if this is a bug, it's a pretty obscure one. It was frustrating
the hell out of me until I found a workaround, so I thought I'd just
post the details:
Given a find like this:
def self.find_old
User.all(:conditions =
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've found myself writing a thing I think is less than optimal, looking for
suggestions. The context is, I'm testing a result, and as a part of that
test, I might verify two or three things, which are individually
On 29/01/2009, at 1:00 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've found myself writing a thing I think is less than optimal,
looking for suggestions. The context is, I'm testing a result, and
as a part of that test, I might verify two or three things, which
are individually relevant
What exactly is the difference between using controller.session and
session? I though that session was just a proxy controller.session,
but this irb/debug sessions show that it isn't:
http://gist.github.com/54673
When I call reset_session in the controller, I'm seeing the
controller's
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've found myself writing a thing I think is less than optimal, looking
for suggestions. The context is, I'm testing a result, and as a part
On 29/01/2009, at 1:41 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM, tatyree t...@snappl.co.uk wrote:
Even if this is a bug, it's a pretty obscure one. It was frustrating
the hell out of me until I found a workaround, so I thought I'd just
post the details:
Given a find like
Hi,
Is it possible to run the html and console formatting concurrently in Cucumber?
Thanks
Aidy
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:02 PM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've found myself writing a thing I think is less
Hi,
Where should we be documenting errors in the Rspec beta book?
Thanks
Aidy
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:36 PM, aidy lewis aidy.le...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Where should we be documenting errors in the Rspec beta book?
There is an Errata link on the main book page that points here:
http://www.pragprog.com/titles/achbd/errata
Aslak
Thanks
Aidy
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM, aidy lewis aidy.le...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to run the html and console formatting concurrently in
Cucumber?
It should be, yes. Check --help for details.
Are you running into any issues?
Aslak
Thanks
Aidy
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:02 PM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM,
On 29/01/2009, at 2:18 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:02 PM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, David Chelimsky
dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nick Hoffman n...@deadorange.com wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 2:18 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:02 PM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:25 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:14 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nick Hoffman n...@deadorange.com wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 2:18 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:02 PM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan
On 29/01/2009, at 4:27 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:14 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nick Hoffman n...@deadorange.com
wrote:
I like on_failure, as it's consistent with RSpec's output. Eg:
31 examples, 0 failures
What
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:27 PM, aslak hellesoy
aslak.helle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:14 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nick Hoffman n...@deadorange.com wrote:
On 29/01/2009, at 2:18 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu,
On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
What exactly is the difference between using controller.session and
session? I though that session was just a proxy controller.session,
but this irb/debug sessions show that it isn't:
http://gist.github.com/54673
When I call
I'm starting to wonder if this is a good idea to begin with. I had started to
suggest nested it()s:
it ... do
it something more do
end
end
... but it's already handled by the existing nested describe(), before(), it()
system.
I guess if we were shooting for flexibility, we might ask
I do like try_to do...end.or_report - much better for the case where I'm not
trying to generate documentation.
I'm not sure it works so well for the case where I want to generate an extra
element of documentation, though this might be just an implementation detail.
.or_report
.or_document
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm starting to wonder if this is a good idea to begin with. I had started
to suggest nested it()s:
it ... do
it something more do
end
end
... but it's already handled by the existing nested describe(), before(),
it()
Ben Mabey wrote:
You can then use the dummy AR classes in your specs with an in-memory
DB.
I hope that helps,
Ben
Oh, yes. very much. Especially this example.
def setup_db
ActiveRecord::Schema.define(:version = 1) do
Have you, or anyone reading this, had any experience with the
On 29 Jan 2009, at 22:20, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've found myself writing a thing I think is less than optimal,
looking
for suggestions. The context
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Matt Wynne m...@mattwynne.net wrote:
On 29 Jan 2009, at 22:20, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've found myself writing a thing
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:41 AM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM, tatyree t...@snappl.co.uk wrote:
Even if this is a bug, it's a pretty obscure one. It was frustrating
the hell out of me until I found a workaround, so I thought I'd just
post
James Byrne wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
You can then use the dummy AR classes in your specs with an in-memory
DB.
I hope that helps,
Ben
Oh, yes. very much. Especially this example.
def setup_db
ActiveRecord::Schema.define(:version = 1) do
Have you, or anyone reading
(Sorry if this is double-posted, I was having trouble with joining the
list)
If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
ActiveRecord models dead simple.
Pat
On Jan 29, 10:18 pm, Ben Mabey
Pat Nakajima wrote:
(Sorry if this is double-posted, I was having trouble with joining the
list)
If you want an easy way to test ActiveRecord extensions, check out
acts_as_fu: http://github.com/nakajima/acts_as_fu. It makes generating
ActiveRecord models dead simple.
Pat
Very slick. I'll
50 matches
Mail list logo
