I'm hoping that the designer (or the co-worker programmer) who won the
Cucumber logo contest will see this message...
I'm looking for a hi-res or vector-based version of the Cucumber logo
for use in a presentation. If the image is not vector based then a
hi-res version with a transparent
On 19 Feb 2009, at 05:40, Stephen Eley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Yi Wen hayafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Without this syntax sugar, we still have to test
validates_presence_of to
make sure it's there and won't broken, right?
Wrong. You don't have to test validates_presence_of.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Ben Mabey b...@benmabey.com wrote:
I'm hoping that the designer (or the co-worker programmer) who won the
Cucumber logo contest will see this message...
I'm looking for a hi-res or vector-based version of the Cucumber logo for
use in a presentation. If the
El 19/2/2009, a las 7:56, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
escribió:
rspec-1.2 and rspec-rails-1.2 are just about ready, but I'd like to
get some feedback from the field before the release. Would the
adventurous among you kindly grab the latest github gems (1.1.99.7 as
of this email) and
Thanks guys, very interesting points.
As a good collegue of mine says, its all about trade offs :)
I agree with changing your production code to make it more testable,
definitely, especially early on in the development process, once your
site is up and running it would have to be done with
Wrong. You don't have to test validates_presence_of. What matters,
and therefore what you should test, is whether the model will complain
at you if a particular value is left empty.
...
If your spec breaks because you changed a method call, you're not
testing behavior any more. You're
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Wincent Colaiuta w...@wincent.com wrote:
El 19/2/2009, a las 7:56, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com escribió:
rspec-1.2 and rspec-rails-1.2 are just about ready, but I'd like to
get some feedback from the field before the release. Would the
adventurous
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:51pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mikel Lindsaar raasd...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
mi...@baci.local ~/ruby_programs/mail
$ autospec
/usr/local/bin/autotest:19:in `load': Is a directory -
Dave, you make a good point. In our system, where we are converting a
legacy database/application, we typically have no user stories and have
the technical (or you could argue user) requirement that the database
logic / constraints get converted. This is where we are typically just
encoding
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:58 AM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, while I used to be very anal and write should
have(1).error_on(:login) and such, I eventually realized that there's
no point. Checking on 'valid?' is entire and sufficient.
I think this depends on whether or
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:56 AM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey fellow behaviour-drivers,
rspec-1.2 and rspec-rails-1.2 are just about ready, but I'd like to
get some feedback from the field before the release. Would the
adventurous among you kindly grab the latest github
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Stephen Eley sfe...@gmail.com wrote:
deliberately_out_of_context_to_make_a_point
If your spec breaks because you changed a method call, you're not
testing behavior any more. You're testing syntax.
/deliberately_out_of_context_to_make_a_point
We've got to stop
1.
http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/ar_mailer/classes/ActionMailer/ARMailer.html
P.S. I'll follow up with a confirmation post just to let the people know
how it worked out for us with ARMailer.
Yeap everything worked like a charm, once again checking email contents
like there is no tomorrow
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Stephen Eley sfe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Mark Wilden m...@mwilden.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
What's the point in testing validates_presence_of for a model?
To make sure
Good point, that's actually I am debating with myself everyday and haven't
got a clear answer. This is classical calssic unit tester vs. mockist war.
:)
Talking about this case:
1. I haven't checked how should valite_presence_of is implemented, but it
could pretty much be checking if the value
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Stephen Eley sfe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:58 AM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, while I used to be very anal and write should
have(1).error_on(:login) and such, I eventually realized that there's
no point. Checking
Hi,
I know this seems all take and no give, but do we have an estimated
final release date for Cucumber 0.2?
Thanks
Aidy
Celerity, Cucumber and Firewatir:
http://skillsmatter.com/event/ruby-on-rails/lrug-march
___
rspec-users mailing list
Just wanted to thank everyone for their replies. I actually recall
that thread now about imperative vs. declarative. I've just re-read
Ben's post along with some of the linked content off the post and now
and I feel a bit more comfortable with the direction I was going in. I
personally
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:52 AM, lasitha lasitha.ranatu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:51pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mikel Lindsaar raasd...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
mi...@baci.local ~/ruby_programs/mail
$ autospec
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Stephen Eley sfe...@gmail.com wrote:
But I did not write any code yet setting the message. Because I
haven't written any tests for the message. At this point I don't care
what the message is, just that I have the right data. I care about
the message when I
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Stephen Eley sfe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Yi Wen hayafi...@gmail.com wrote:
validates_presence_of happens to be the name of the method in
ActiveRecord that does that. But if you decide to write your own
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:55 AM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
This is where this all gets tricky.
Yep. 8-
TDD (remember? that's where this all started) says you don't write any
subject code without a failing *unit test*. This is not about the end
result - it's about a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Mark Wilden m...@mwilden.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Stephen Eley sfe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Yi Wen hayafi...@gmail.com wrote:
validates_presence_of happens to be the name of the method in
ActiveRecord that does
I've got an AR-model with some find-magic I want to test. When I have
ActiveRecord::Base.should_receive(:find).with(anything(),assert_options)
MyModel.find(:all,find_options)
in my example find-method somehow disappears alltogether and I get
NoMethodError in 'MyModel find-options are
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tero Tilus t...@tilus.net wrote:
I've got an AR-model with some find-magic I want to test. When I have
ActiveRecord::Base.should_receive(:find).with(anything(),assert_options)
MyModel.find(:all,find_options)
MyModel != ActiveRecord::Base
Try this
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title can't
be blank and so on).
Can someone point me please to an example where I can see how to mock my
model and stub all methods needed for the view?
On 19 Feb 2009, at 20:54, Martin wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title
can't be blank and so on).
Can someone point me please to an example where I can see how to
mock my model
On 19 feb 2009, at 21:54, Martin wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title
can't be blank and so on).
Can someone point me please to an example where I can see how to
mock my model
On Feb 19, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Martin wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title
can't be blank and so on).
Can someone point me please to an example where I can see how to
mock my model
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Martin html-k...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title can't be
blank and so on).
Can someone point me please to an example where I can see how
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Matt Wynne m...@mattwynne.net wrote:
On 19 Feb 2009, at 20:54, Martin wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title can't be
blank and so on).
Can someone
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Martin html-k...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title can't be
blank and so on).
Can someone point me please to an example where I can see how
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Zach Dennis zach.den...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Martin html-k...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test my views using rspec. I want to test my edit- and
new-view also for the case an error occurs (something like title can't be
blank
33 matches
Mail list logo
