Thanks for the explanation, David!
Makes sense now.
Best,
Nickolay
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Thanks, David.
I hope that is less/non dependent on Rails/ActiveSupport. It seems to
depend on Nokogiri, and hopefully uses some duck-typeable response
object. I guess they use response_body.
I've concocted a strange brew of RSpec, Johnson and envjs. It can already
execute normal Javascript metho
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Ed Howland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write an example that uses response.should have_tag('div')
> outside of a Rails view test. I read somewhere that as long as you
> have an instance variable named @response and it respondes to .body
> with some HTML, it sho
Hi,
I'm trying to write an example that uses response.should have_tag('div')
outside of a Rails view test. I read somewhere that as long as you
have an instance variable named @response and it respondes to .body
with some HTML, it should work, but I get this failure:
undefined method `assert_sele
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:24 PM, patrick99e99 wrote:
>> That's likely because cucumber is generating a rerun.txt file and
>> autotest is picking that up for some reason.
>
> Ah.. I do see that in my project directory there is a rerun.txt
> file... How did that get created, and is the solution j
> That's likely because cucumber is generating a rerun.txt file and
> autotest is picking that up for some reason.
Ah.. I do see that in my project directory there is a rerun.txt
file... How did that get created, and is the solution just to delete
it?
-patrick
__
I also get the infinite looping of the cucumber features being run.
The way I stopped it is by adding this:
Autotest.add_hook :initialize do |at|
%w{.svn .hg .git vendor rerun.txt}.each {|exception|
at.add_exception(exception)
}
end
to ~/.autotest
Is there a better to do this?
On Wed,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:07 AM, kat...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think I have solved this.
>
> I was using config.gem for cucumber and cucumber-rails. Setting :lib
> => false solves this problem.
>
> Would you consider specifying this on
> http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/ruby-on-rails?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Nickolay Kolev wrote:
>> This is not working for the reason that I think you think it's
>> working. and_return is not an expectation - it is a command telling
>> @teacher to return @new_course when it receives :build. You have to
>> define @new_course in the spec.
I think I have solved this.
I was using config.gem for cucumber and cucumber-rails. Setting :lib
=> false solves this problem.
Would you consider specifying this on
http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/ruby-on-rails?
Kaushik
On Feb 16, 9:03 am, "kat...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hello,
> I
> This is not working for the reason that I think you think it's
> working. and_return is not an expectation - it is a command telling
> @teacher to return @new_course when it receives :build. You have to
> define @new_course in the spec.
I did the following:
http://gist.github.com/306521
and it
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:24 PM, patrick99e99 wrote:
>> What command are you running?
>
> I have just been doing script/autospec
>
> .. I actually posted on the rspecbook forum (haven't heard anything
> yet, so I'll ask here) regarding autospec.. When I ran it, it told me
> that features were b
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Nickolay Kolev wrote:
>> I don't see @new_course getting defined anywhere. Try assigning it a
>> non-nil value in each of the POST examples (or in before(:each) in
>> that group).
>
> Thanks, David!
>
> Am I right in assuming that I have to check that @new_course r
> I don't see @new_course getting defined anywhere. Try assigning it a
> non-nil value in each of the POST examples (or in before(:each) in
> that group).
Thanks, David!
Am I right in assuming that I have to check that @new_course received
a "save" and returned true in the same it-block?
This wo
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:09 AM, mikev wrote:
>
> I'm trying to match a string in a hash passed to :find using a regular
> expression since I don't want to know all the other details of
> the :conditions passed to find. I've tried variations on the
> following with no success, e.g., not using has
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ben Fyvie wrote:
> I have some code that adds to the callbacks that rspec-rails adds by default
> to href="http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec-rails/blob/master/lib/spec/rails/interop/testcase.rb";>setup
> and teardown fixtures.
>
>
>
> My code looks something lik
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Nickolay Kolev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to spec a controller for a nested resource:
>
> http://gist.github.com/306521
>
> Running the spec as it is in the gist results in
>
> undefined method `save' for nil:NilClass (line 66 in the gist)
>
> So should_recei
Hi all,
I am trying to spec a controller for a nested resource:
http://gist.github.com/306521
Running the spec as it is in the gist results in
undefined method `save' for nil:NilClass (line 66 in the gist)
So should_receive is interfering with the build message resulting in
@course ending up n
18 matches
Mail list logo
