On Aug 1, 2010, at 10:08 PM, Myron Marston wrote:
OK, I tried to implement #module_exec on ruby 1.8.6, and here's what I
came up with:
http://github.com/myronmarston/rspec-core/commit/364f20ebd5b7d9612227cb6e86a6e8c8c2e9931e
It works (at least in the sense that it allows the specs and
On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:09 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Aug 2, 2010, at 7:46 AM, rogerdpack wrote:
Got this:
no such file to load -- spec/rake/spectask
anybody know off hand what the equivalent is for rspec2?
rspec/core/rake_task
I'll add that to Upgrade.markdown
http
On Aug 2, 2010, at 7:46 AM, rogerdpack wrote:
Got this:
no such file to load -- spec/rake/spectask
anybody know off hand what the equivalent is for rspec2?
rspec/core/rake_task
I'll add that to Upgrade.markdown
-r
___
rspec-users mailing
On Aug 1, 2010, at 9:43 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 31, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Myron Marston wrote:
You can still get the same outcome, but you have to implement it in the
group like this:
unless defined?(:foo)
def foo; foo; end
end
Good point--I hadn't thought of that. The one
the customization block to define methods, hooks
(before/after) and let(). Now it just feels like the rest of RSpec.
Thoughts?
Myron
On Jul 31, 12:56 am, Ashley Moran ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk
wrote:
On 31 Jul 2010, at 1:10 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
You can still get the same outcome
On Aug 1, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Myron Marston wrote:
The particular issue of simple values being used in the docstrings and the
examples themselves (i.e. exposed to everything in the block scope) could be
handled like this:
shared_examples_for blah do |a,b|
...
end
On Aug 1, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Myron Marston wrote:
Seems like your mental model is that of a customization block being a
subclass or re-opening of the shared block. What you say makes sense in that
model, but that's not the same model I have.
My mental model is indeed that the customization
On Aug 1, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On 1 Aug 2010, at 3:43 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
shared_examples_for blah do |a,b|
...
end
it_should_behave_like blah, 1, 2
That wouldn't have worked with the old implementation, but it would work
perfectly well now. This would
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:03 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 29, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
and
~/mygreatapp/ $ ./script/plugin install
svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_X_Y_Z/vendor/rspec_on_rails/vendor/plugins/rspec
rspec_on_rails is 2 years old
On Jul 30, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.8/bin/rcov:511
config.gem rspec-rails, :version = = 1.3.2
OK - so the problem now is that you've got rspec-rails
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:09 AM, Rainer Kuhn wrote:
On Jul 29, 3:29 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Rainer Kuhn wrote:
Consider putting out some information on rake spec, when rspec ist
only defined in the :test group.
This just cost me an hour until
On Jul 30, 2010, at 9:03 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
Hi
I finally looked into why this is not currently possibly in RSpec 2 (beta
19):
shared_examples_for Etymology do
describe The etymology of foo do
it is followed
On Jul 30, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:10 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
Maybe that, or a DSL that wraps that, is the better way, so we can get the
best of both worlds?
shared_examples_for Enumerable do
require_instance_method :foo, gotta have foo
On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Myron Marston wrote:
On Jul 30, 2:58 pm, Ashley Moran ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk
wrote:
On 30 Jul 2010, at 5:00 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
By all means.
I've started on that and filed a ticket[1].
One question I have, is I keep calling the Example Group
On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
Hello,
I recently unpacked the latest rspec and rspec rails in my
applicaiton.
How did you unpack them (what command did you use)?
When I run my specs I get:
$ rcov user_spec.rb
Where are you typing this command? What happens when you type
On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:45 AM, Mislav Marohnić wrote:
When you install the rspec-rails stack, the rspec gem post-install messages
take more than 60 lines in total. Most of those messages are something
uninformative like thank you for installing the rspec-blah. Um, OK. You're
welcome, I
On Jul 27, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Rainer Kuhn wrote:
Consider putting out some information on rake spec, when rspec ist
only defined in the :test group.
This just cost me an hour until I read the blog post explaining it.
Thing is, rake spec doesn't show on rake -T but it runs fine, just
not
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Zhenning Guan wrote:
class A
def process
@b.calculate
end
end
it 'should change b calculate value' do
@b.should_receive(:calculate)
@a.process
@b.calculae_value.should == 'after_calculae'
end
it will fail, if I comment out
On Jul 29, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Anderson Leite wrote:
I have an action and I am testing it like this:
The action:
==
def create
@event = Evento.new(params[:event])
@event.aproved = false
if @event.save
redirect_to :action = index
else
render :action = new
On Jul 29, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:19 AM, Amit Jain wrote:
Hello,
I recently unpacked the latest rspec and rspec rails in my
applicaiton.
How did you unpack them (what command did you use)?
I just install rspec gem through
On Jul 28, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Jarmo Pertman wrote:
Hello!
I have some questions/proposals which have been quite time on my mind
already.
Let's suppose i have files under spec directory with the following
structure and contents:
# spec/helper.rb
module Helper
end
# spec/my_spec.rb
On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:42 PM, nruth wrote:
Please correct me if this is fixed in Rspec 2, but in Rspec 1 I have
hit upon the following problem (at least thrice, this time it costing
me several hours), code is the best example:
I have a practice examination system where each record is one of
On Jul 27, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Bruno Cardoso wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Bruno Cardoso wrote:
Thanks for the answers.
What both solutions (from Ashley and David) do is not modify the BD in
anyway, so nothing gets dropped and nothing is created
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Lille wrote:
Hi,
class B ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :a
validates_numericality_of :some_attribute, :greater_than =
0, :allow_blank=true
def some_attribute
a.numeric_attr * read_attribute(:some_attribute)
end
...
If I create an instance
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 5:12 pm, Bruno Cardoso wrote:
Not sure if this is a RSpec problem or Rails but I believe is more a
RSpec situation.
What happens is that when I run my RSpecs tests all the BD is recreated,
...
Anyone know how
On Jul 26, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Bruno Cardoso wrote:
Thanks for the answers.
What both solutions (from Ashley and David) do is not modify the BD in
anyway, so nothing gets dropped and nothing is created. This resolves
the problem but what if I want a clean installation in each test run?
So
There is a feature request to make a distinction between exceptions and logical
failures in RSpec's output. If this topic interests you, please take a look at
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/#issue/93 and add your thoughts to
the conversation there.
Thx,
David
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Lille lille.pengu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been browsing the RSpec book and the RDoc, but I can't see how to
ensure the following:
Stub an instance with a method it doesn't have and raise NoMethodError
(or something like it.)
RSpec doesn't support
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Patrick Gannon patgan...@gmail.com wrote:
I just got a chance to try this, and ran into more problems. Prior to
trying this, we were running RSpec2 beta 13. When I changed our Gemfile to
depend on 'edge' RSpec et al (as you suggested above), I get a very
On Jul 24, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 24/07/2010, a las 08:26, David Chelimsky escribió:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Lille lille.pengu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been browsing the RSpec book and the RDoc, but I can't see how to
ensure the following:
Stub
On Jul 24, 2010, at 9:33 AM, chatgris wrote:
Hello,
I have two issues with beta 2.0.0.beta.18. First, here's the gems :
gem rails, 3.0.0.beta4
gem mongoid, 2.0.0.beta10
group :test do
gem rspec-rails, 2.0.0.beta.18
gem factory_girl_rails, 1.0
end
My spec_helper :
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:48 AM, ericindc wrote:
I'm unsure why this test is still failing. I've tested it in console
and the code works as expected. Is there something wrong with how I
have my test written?
** error
1) Job selecting the next job to be processed should
On Jul 21, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
trying out new syntax from jon larkowski's rspec presentation. Following
doesn't work in that when I run the line from the command prompt or from
textmate no specs are run
context cancel do
subject do
order =
On Jul 21, 2010, at 4:17 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Peter Fitzgibbons wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Peter Fitzgibbons wrote:
HI All,
I would like to perform my spec runs
On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Peter Fitzgibbons wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Peter Fitzgibbons wrote:
HI All,
I would like to perform my spec runs without the db:test:prepare rake
prereq.
It would
On Jul 19, 2010, at 7:51 AM, Jay wrote:
I'm in the process of upgrading my rails app to rails 3 and I'm
getting different results from running the 2 commands above. The
bundle exec rspec runs my tests correctly, but when I run rake
spec it doesn't seem to do anything. I get 0 examples, 0
On Jul 12, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Ruprict wrote:
Hi.
My issue is similar to the one in this post:
http://groups.google.com/group/rspec/browse_thread/thread/973d770e45bdd6cd/8ba067476003f08f?lnk=gstq=render+controller+should_receive#8ba067476003f08f
(which, btw, I could not reply to...only
On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:07 PM, rogerdpack wrote:
Hi all. Noticed that with rspec 1.x
methods at higher levels aren't available in lower, ex:
context a do
def go
end
it should pass do
go
end
it should pass again do
context a::b do
You can't wrap contexts inside examples.
On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Peter Fitzgibbons wrote:
HI All,
I would like to perform my spec runs without the db:test:prepare rake prereq.
It would be nice if I could alter spec to prereq db:test:purge only.
Could you give me some advice/urls/pointers on how best to go about this?
On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:17 AM, rogerdpack wrote:
Hi all.
Saw this:
Usage: rspec [options] [files or directories]
-b, --backtrace Enable full backtrace
-c, --[no-]color, --[no-]colour Enable color in the output
-d, --debug Enable debugging
Hey all,
I'm thinking of deprecating mock_model in rspec-rails-2. stub_model is more
stable, reliable (not dependent on Rails internals like mock_model is), much
less intrusive, and I find that I use it all the time in spite of the need to
create a real model to back it up.
Anybody attached
On Jul 19, 2010, at 7:47 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Hey all,
I'm thinking of deprecating mock_model in rspec-rails-2. stub_model is more
stable, reliable (not dependent on Rails internals like mock_model is), much
less intrusive, and I find that I use it all the time in spite of the need
On Jul 18, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Shane Mingins wrote:
On 19 July 2010 12:32, Shane Mingins e...@mingins.com wrote:
Hi All
I was wondering if someone could perhaps point me to where in RSpec::Rails is
the Rails ActionController being subclassed by an Object instance? My
ruby-fu is not high
On Jul 18, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Shane Mingins wrote:
And so ...
# Sets the controller class name. Useful if the name can't be inferred
from test class.
# Expects +controller_class+ as a constant. Example: tttests
WidgetController/tt.
def tests(controller_class)
On 19 July 2010 13:45, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Shane Mingins wrote:
And so ...
# Sets the controller class name. Useful if the name can't be inferred
from test class.
# Expects +controller_class+ as a constant. Example: tttests
On Jul 17, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
Today I've been writing some tests for a new rails 3 app, but after
reading the doc from http://rdoc.info/projects/rspec/rspec-expectations,
I still can't understand why the test doesn't work. My setup is:
rvm 0.1.41
ruby
On Jul 17, 2010, at 8:09 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 17, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
Today I've been writing some tests for a new rails 3 app, but after
reading the doc from http://rdoc.info/projects/rspec/rspec-expectations,
I still can't understand why
On Jul 17, 2010, at 10:37 AM, doug livesey wrote:
Hi -- how are people speccing Rails 3 ActiveRecord queries?
At the minute I'm chaining a load of should_receive calls on mock relation
objects, but can't help thinking that there must be a more elegant way of
going about it.
Is there a best
On Jul 17, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
On Jul 17, 9:41 am, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2010, at 8:09 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 17, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
Today I've been writing some tests for a new rails 3
On Jul 17, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Costa Shapiro wrote:
Hello,
I've been thinking of how to express my idea in code, but since I've never
been involved in RSpec development, I'd better have some feedback here first.
The feature suggestion below applies to any controller-like code under spec,
On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:45 AM, Tom Stuart wrote:
On 16 Jul 2010, at 10:29, Matt Wynne wrote:
For those following along at home, this exact technique did not work. The
+actual_foo+ variable was holding some mock value instead of the real self
value.
Sorry. Do we think this is a bug in rspec?
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Greg Ditrick wrote:
All,
I have a method in a shared Module that shuffles data and then output other
data. The method is somewhat large (maybe 50 lines) and sometimes calls
other sub methods to help to complete the output which must meet a specific
On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Matt Kolenda wrote:
Hello
I'm having some trouble getting rspec to recognize a route.
# This works
describe routes do
it should have a route do
{ :get = /accounts/3/jobs/3/
applications/1/edit }.should route_to(:controller = 'applications',
Hey all,
For anyone interested in shared example groups, please read and feel free to
comment on http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/#issue/71.
Cheers,
David
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
On Jul 16, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Greg Ditrick wrote:
David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Greg Ditrick wrote:
This sounds like a long, procedural method. Can it be broken down any
further (i.e. delegating more of its work to other methods)?
Yes
On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Do you know about integrate_views?
http://rspec.info/rails/writing/controllers.html
I read about it in my quest through the documentation for a solution
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Patel, Mihir wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to BDD. I have ruby 1.8.7 on my RHEL5 computer. I am trying to
install RSpec by “gem install rspec” but I get an error saying : “could not
find rspec locally or in a repository”, Please help me out.
Please type gem env
On Jul 15, 2010, at 5:53 PM, ericindc wrote:
How do I run Heckle with RSpec? I've tried rake spec --heckle but get
no output. I've tried just -heckle too, as mentioned in the docs, but
that isn't accepted as a valid option and the help out is displayed.
I have both the heckle and
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Arco wrote:
In a recent blog post, David wrote:
Because RSpec is the test framework of record, Rails doesn’t know to
hide the test_unit generators. If you want to hide them, just add this
to one of your config files:
On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:44 PM, rogerdpack wrote:
Would it be possible to have pending be accessible everywhere?
Curgem rently with
describe '' do
pending 'abc' do
end
end
In rspec-2, you can do this:
describe something, :pending = true do
...
end
And all the examples in that group
On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Ivo Dancet wrote:
Hi
I'm upgrading an application to rspec2/rails3. A certain suite of tests, that
generates a pdf document, uses a before(:all) filter to set the environment
using mocks and stubs. Then the pdf gets generated and after that all the
tests run
On Jul 13, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
So the stock answer to this is don't do it. But I'm in a situation
where it's really what I want to do to test what I want to test.
a helper method:
def some_helper
render(:partial = some/partial, :locals = {:some = some}
end
On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Benyi Wang wrote:
I'm wondering what's the difference between stub and message expectation with
any_number_of_times, for example:
myMock = mock(mymock)
myMock.stub!(:is_a?).with(MyClass).and_return(false)
and
myMock = mock(mymock)
On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
against the return strings?
Any way at all? I've been trying for a while with no success. Thanks for
any advice.
RSpec version?
Good point. Rails2
On Jul 10, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Kevin wrote
I keep getting this error message:
/Users/kevin/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.16/lib/
rspec/
rails/fixture_support.rb:12: uninitialized constant
RSpec::Rails::FixtureSupport::ActiveRecord (NameError)
from
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Mike Gehard wrote:
Good morning,
I am using Rails3 (beta4) and RSpec2 (beta 15) under RVM and am running into
an interesting issue.
My request tests using webrat seem to think that they are running in the
development Rails environment (I know this because
On Jul 6, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Guilherme wrote:
Hi,
How can I test this method using rspec ?
def self.generate_calculation number1, number2, operation
number1 = rand(number1)
number2 = rand(number2)
...
end
This method return an operation with those random numbers.
On Jul 9, 2010, at 1:28 AM, siva wrote:
Hi
Thanks in advance for helping me. I got the following error:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.3.5/lib/
active_support/whiny_nil.rb:52:in `method_missing': undefined method
`strip' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
from
On Jul 10, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
On Jul 9, 2:45 pm, Daniel Salmeron Amselem daniel.amse...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been trying to test a very simple action on a controller with
this setup:
rspec 1.3.0
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [universal-darwin10.0]
On Jul 10, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
On Jul 10, 2:31 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
On Jul 9, 2:45 pm, Daniel Salmeron Amselem daniel.amse...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been trying
On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
On Jul 10, 3:53 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
On Jul 10, 2:31 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Daniel Salmeron
On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
You're right David, my fault. Than you very much for all your help.
You got it working then?
On Jul 10, 4:32 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem wrote:
On Jul 10, 3:53
On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:59 AM, garren wrote:
On Jul 7, 12:34 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:26 AM, Trevor Lalish-Menagh wrote:
Did you know about the rspec-dev meta project?
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-dev
That is great. I should have looked
On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:06 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:59 AM, garren wrote:
On Jul 7, 12:34 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:26 AM, Trevor Lalish-Menagh wrote:
Did you know about the rspec-dev meta project?
http://github.com/rspec
On Jul 8, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Juanma Cervera wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
Spec::Runner.configure do |c|
c.before(:each) do
ActiveRecord::Base::establish_connection :secondary_db
DatabaseCleaner.start
ActiveRecord::Base::establish_connection :primary_db
end
c.after(:each) do
On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:24 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
On 8 July 2010 01:01, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
Hi there.
My understanding (which is limited) is that rspec uses at_exit to run its
specs. I don't really know why
On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:29 AM, doug livesey wrote:
Hi -- I'm trying to use the excellent Cells gem in a Rails 3 project with
RSpec 2.
I've got the 'controller' bit of the cells specced okay, but I'm struggling
with the 'view' bit.
What I want to do is to use RSpec's view helper methods to
On Jul 8, 2010, at 5:04 AM, Juanma Cervera wrote:
Hello
How can I test equality with two objects when they include some
attribute that is BigDecimal?
if I make something like this:
it should ...whatever do
obj = Factory.create(:my_object)
...
MyObject.first.should == obj
end.
Hey all,
Following up on the problem with textmate after removing the at_exit hook (see
http://groups.google.com/group/rspec/browse_thread/thread/37bbe78aa52682b0):
The problem is that the file(s) do(es) not get loaded by the rspec runner. They
appear to be required by TextMate prior to
On Jul 8, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jay McGaffigan wrote:
a little more investigation shows that the bundle is really having
trouble loading the 'spec/autorun' file in mate.rb
it appears that rubygems is not loaded (I'm not using bundler on this
project (yet)).
If I mod mate.rb to require
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:26 AM, Trevor Lalish-Menagh wrote:
Did you know about the rspec-dev meta project?
http://github.com/rspec/rspec-dev
That is great. I should have looked for that before setting this up. I just
didn't think about it.
Perhaps we should update the rspec-* READMEs
On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 07/07/2010, a las 13:29, David Chelimsky escribió:
Seems as though this format has been abandoned in this conversation:
it { should route(get /issues/new).to(issues#new) }
it { should generate(/issues/new).from(issues#new) }
I
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
Hi there.
My understanding (which is limited) is that rspec uses at_exit to run its
specs. I don't really know why - could somoene explain?
The initial motivation was that it makes it easy to make sure it works whether
you run it with the
On Jul 6, 2010, at 6:49 AM, andreyr wrote:
Hi,
i have a problem that any of my rspec rake tasks fail with the following
error:
rake -f unittests.rake spec
** Invoke spec (first_time)
** Execute spec
On Jul 5, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Lalish-Menagh, Trevor wrote:
OK, I will chime in here, since I think I might have opened up this
can of worms. :)
I agree with David that we should stick with wrapping the Rails public
APIs. That is: assert_generates, assert_recognizes, and assert_routing
On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 5 Jul 2010, at 08:00, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been unhappy with routing specs for a long time now and last night when
updating some old 1.3 specs for 2.0 I decided to see if I could come up with
something that didn't make me
On Jul 4, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Frank Mattia wrote:
What's the appropriate way to test namespaced routes with rspec-2
rails 3?
I imagined that the following would work but it does not.
describe Admin::UsersController do
describe routing do
it recognizes and generates #index do
{
On Jul 5, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Pixel wrote:
In an effort to teach myself BDD I'm trying it out. I'm trying to do a
simple (should be straightforward) spec on my application.html.haml file
first looking for a div tag with the class 'nav' it seems that rspec isn't
able to render the
On Jul 5, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 05/07/2010, a las 13:56, David Chelimsky escribió:
Nice overall. Much of the code belongs in Rails, though, so I'd like to try
to get a patch in to Rails once we get this worked out. I'd like the
rspec-rails matchers to be simple
On Jul 5, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 05/07/2010, a las 18:18, David Chelimsky escribió:
The thing that concerns me the most is the DestinationParser. Even though it
seems simple, that's the sort of code that ends up making rspec-rails a
rails-dependent maintenance
On Jul 3, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Saturday 03 July 2010, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jul 3, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Michael Schuerig wrote:
[double loading of Rails framework classes]
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + /../config/environment unless
defined?(Rails
On Jul 5, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Pixel wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 5, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Pixel wrote:
In an effort to teach myself BDD I'm trying it out. I'm trying to do a
simple (should be straightforward) spec on my
On Jul 5, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 05/07/2010, a las 19:17, David Chelimsky escribió:
On Jul 5, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
El 05/07/2010, a las 18:18, David Chelimsky escribió:
The thing that concerns me the most is the DestinationParser. Even though
On Jul 2, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Patrick Gannon wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a problem where stubbed static methods aren't properly becoming
unstubbed. I have tried manually unstubbing them, but it still doesn't
work.
Spec is as follows:
it creates user accounts for unknown users do
On Jul 3, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Michael Schuerig wrote:
I'm working on an engine that extends ActionController::Base like this
module MyEngine
class Engine Rails::Engine
config.after_initialize do
ActionController::Base.class_eval do
include MyEngine::ControllerExtension
On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Arco wrote:
I generate a new rails3 app using rails new my_app -T.
Then i run cd my_app ; rails generate, and I don't see any test_unit
options. (as expected).
Then I put gem 'rspec-rails' into my Gemfile, and re-run rails
generate.
Now I see options for
Amir
On Jun 30, 2010 10:56 PM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Timo Rößner wrote:
On Jun 29, 12:14 pm, David Chelimsky dchelim.
The command is rspec in rspec 2. Try:
bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
@David,
alright, I tried
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Ibrahim Awwal wrote:
On Jul 1, 9:25 am, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Ibrahim Awwal wrote:
Hi guys,
Apologies if this is a dumb question. I'm new to rails and most of the
information online is about rails 2
On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Arco wrote:
I would like to use the --line parameter with nested example groups
(describe / context).
It looks to me like rspec handles this fine if I select the innermost
group.
But if I select an outer group, rspec ignores all the nested examples.
Is this
On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Ibrahim Awwal wrote:
Hi guys,
I apologize if this is a dumb question, but in rspec-rails version
2.0.0.14 (for rails 3.0.0b4) I'm trying to add configuration options
like some tutorials mention in a file spec/spec.opts, but this has no
effect. I glanced through
801 - 900 of 2985 matches
Mail list logo
