On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Matt Hauck wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:48:37 PM UTC-7, Justin Ko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Matt Hauck wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to specify a message expectation on an object to occur
>> _without_ a particular argument?
>>
>> There is
Hmm, that's not exactly what I was thinking of... I don't mean that there
should be no arguments at all, but that the arguments should _not_ be of a
certain match.
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:48:37 PM UTC-7, Justin Ko wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Matt Hauck wrote:
>
> Is there a wa
On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Matt Hauck wrote:
> Is there a way to specify a message expectation on an object to occur
> _without_ a particular argument?
>
> There is a particular function, which in some special circumstance takes a
> unique argument, but in normal circumstances does not take t
Is there a way to specify a message expectation on an object to occur
_without_ a particular argument?
There is a particular function, which in some special circumstance takes a
unique argument, but in normal circumstances does not take this unique
argument. I want to say something like this:
