On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Joe Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, one test runner could repeatedly run (or once a minute,
> or whatever) the entire test suite. And one test runner could run the
> related tests for the file you change.
>
> Perhaps two autotest instances,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:10 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Paul Dowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, I'm mostly quite happy using autotest with rspec, but there's one
> > thing that's been bothering me, and as my test suite grows larger
On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Paul Dowman wrote:
> Hi, I'm mostly quite happy using autotest with rspec, but there's one
> thing that's been bothering me, and as my test suite grows larger it'd
> becoming more painful.
>
> Autotest re-runs the entire suite whenever a spec that had previously
> f
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Paul Dowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm mostly quite happy using autotest with rspec, but there's one
> thing that's been bothering me, and as my test suite grows larger it'd
> becoming more painful.
>
> Autotest re-runs the entire suite whenever a spe
Hi, I'm mostly quite happy using autotest with rspec, but there's one
thing that's been bothering me, and as my test suite grows larger it'd
becoming more painful.
Autotest re-runs the entire suite whenever a spec that had previously
failed passes for the first time. I find that incompatible with
