GAh! easy one - I was adding the method argument to the 'route_for()'
instead of the 'should ==' hash it compares the generated output with.
And now I see how the script you made takes the single string argument
from the old style and drops it into a hash that includes the restful
method name.
Than
Thank you for posting this.
Is this a script to replace/add arguments to the route_for methods in
my current controller routing specs?
Will the changes this script affects fix the errors I get when running
specs like " route_for(_whatever_)should == '/foo/1' " on :update
and :destroy actions genera
Trying the next release of rspec, I have had to make changes in the
existing specs for routing.
I have written an script with sed that makes this automatically (two
files)
spec/upgrade.sed
/route_for/s/id => 1/id => "1"/g
/route_for.*create/s/== \(["'].*["']\)/== {:path => \1, :m
