Bah, I won't have time to do this anytime soon, you can feel free,
Scott.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2944
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2944
rails edge revision 8186
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:25 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> I like what Scott suggested.
>
> it_should_behave_like "a foo", :with => { ... }
>
> Might read a little better. But I like the idea of it just taking
> a hash.
>
The obvious problem with this approach is that it will crowd the
namespace (dec
I like what Scott suggested.
it_should_behave_like "a foo", :with => { ... }
Might read a little better. But I like the idea of it just taking a hash.
-Ben
Nathan Sutton wrote:
> Anyone else have any opinions on this? I'd like to get some more input.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nathan Sutton
> [EMAIL PR
Anyone else have any opinions on this? I'd like to get some more input.
Thanks,
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
rails edge revision 8175
On Nov 21, 2007, at 4:58 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Nathan Sutton
On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Nathan Sutton wrote:
> Not even sure, what are your thoughts?
>
> Nathan Sutton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rspec edge revision 2910
> rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
> rails edge revision 8175
>
I'd like to see something like this:
it_should_behave_like "a foo", :vari
Not even sure, what are your thoughts?
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
rails edge revision 8175
On Nov 21, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Nathan Sutton wrote:
>
>> Ooh, I totally want to do this,
Oh, and the reason I include this is because it's always a question
when discussing things, and this makes it always available, both to
those reading now and those who may read these conversations in the
future.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge rev
On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Nathan Sutton wrote:
> Ooh, I totally want to do this, I'll work on it this week along with
> my other patch i have yet to submit this week, unless Scott is partial
> to doing it. Do you want it, Scott?
Go for it. Let me know if you don't want it.
What is the synt
On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 4:16 PM, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Nathan Sutton
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> rspec edge revision 2910
>> rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
>> rails edge revision 8175
>
> Have you added this to your signature?
Yeah, I'm currently doing it manually though, and this email is only
for mailing lists.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
rails edge revision 8175
On Nov 21, 2007, at 4:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 4:16 PM, Nathan Su
On Nov 21, 2007 4:16 PM, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Sutton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rspec edge revision 2910
> rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
> rails edge revision 8175
Have you added this to your signature
___
rspec-users mail
Ooh, I totally want to do this, I'll work on it this week along with
my other patch i have yet to submit this week, unless Scott is partial
to doing it. Do you want it, Scott?
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
rails edge revision 8175
On Nov 21, 2007 3:53 PM, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 4:22 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 21, 2007 3:14 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared
> >> behaviour. I'm
> >> sur
On Nov 21, 2007, at 4:22 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 3:14 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared
>> behaviour. I'm
>> sure an example will say it better than my words
>>
>> describe "my shared", :shared
Some of this clears up my issues around sharing behaviors that you can
pass parameters to. I was doing a hackish solution before by
including a module then calling a method it provides, but now I can
have shared behaviors and just have them call specific methods which
then become a convent
On Nov 22, 2007 8:31 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 10:22 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 21, 2007 3:14 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared
> behavi
On Nov 21, 2007 10:22 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 3:14 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared behaviour. I'm
> > sure an example will say it better than my words
> >
> > describe "m
David to the rescue! :)
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
rails edge revision 8175
On Nov 21, 2007, at 3:22 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 3:14 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to be able to get a
On Nov 22, 2007 8:22 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 3:14 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared behaviour.
> I'm
> > sure an example will say it better than my words
> >
> > describe "m
On Nov 21, 2007 3:14 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared behaviour. I'm
> sure an example will say it better than my words
>
> describe "my shared", :shared => true do
>
> it "should tell me what the class is its describi
yep
should == User
expected: User,
got: # (using ==)
On Nov 22, 2007 8:15 AM, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you try self.class
>
> ??
> Nathan Sutton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rspec edge revision 2910
> rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
> rails edge revision 8175
>
>
>
> On Nov
Did you try self.class
??
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2910
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2909
rails edge revision 8175
On Nov 21, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Daniel N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared
> behaviour. I'm sure an example
Hi,
I want to be able to get at the described class in my shared behaviour. I'm
sure an example will say it better than my words
describe "my shared", :shared => true do
it "should tell me what the class is its describing" do
how_do_i_get_the_user_class_here
end
end
describe User do
23 matches
Mail list logo
