On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Tim Harper wrote:
> Actually, now that I think about it, Spork claims the Kernel#debugger
> method before Rspec checks if it should install it's catch, so it might be
> fine.
>
> Still, I would prefer if if the above "require 'ruby-debug'; debugger"
> convention s
I'm not exactly sure what the motivation behind the "debugger" catch was,
perhaps a convenience method to allow your code to remain littered with
debugger statements? At any rate, it's obstructed my normal use of
ruby-debug, and regardless of whether I've passed the -d or --debug flag, it
still com
Actually, now that I think about it, Spork claims the Kernel#debugger method
before Rspec checks if it should install it's catch, so it might be fine.
Still, I would prefer if if the above "require 'ruby-debug'; debugger"
convention still worked.
Tim
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Tim Harper
