On Apr 25, 9:19 am, Alisson Sales wrote:
> I've found the problem. The gem meta_where
> (https://github.com/ernie/meta_where) is doing something wrong in ruby
> 1.9.2, just removing it from my Gemfile and my suite is running fast
> again(6 seconds).
>
> Thank you guys, I'll open a issue on the met
Great work! Thanks for following up.
Cheers,
David
On Apr 25, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Alisson Sales wrote:
> I've found the problem. The gem meta_where
> (https://github.com/ernie/meta_where) is doing something wrong in ruby
> 1.9.2, just removing it from my Gemfile and my suite is running fast
> agai
I've found the problem. The gem meta_where
(https://github.com/ernie/meta_where) is doing something wrong in ruby
1.9.2, just removing it from my Gemfile and my suite is running fast
again(6 seconds).
Thank you guys, I'll open a issue on the meta_where project.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Ro
Em 24-04-2011 19:22, Alisson Sales escreveu:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Sidu Ponnappa wrote:
Are you perhaps seeing http://is.gd/6aINHC ? We've moved several Rails
projects to 1.9.2 over the last few months and we've found our builds
running slower on all (we use RSpec too).
I'm not sure
Unfortunately I don't have a Rails project handy that builds on both
1.8 and 1.9, but here are the results for a pure Ruby project:
https://gist.github.com/939981
As you can see, the build times are nearly identical across 1.8.7,
REE, 1.9.2 and 1.9.3-dev (I'm using RSpec 2.6.0.rc2).
Are you seein
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Sidu Ponnappa wrote:
> Are you perhaps seeing http://is.gd/6aINHC ? We've moved several Rails
> projects to 1.9.2 over the last few months and we've found our builds
> running slower on all (we use RSpec too).
I'm not sure if the problem is the startup time. Does
Oh, and it should be sorted in 1.9.3:
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3924
Note that this only impacts startup times - your app should still run
faster on 1.9.2.
Best,
Sidu.
http://c42.in
http://about.me/ponnappa
On 25 April 2011 02:53, Sidu Ponnappa wrote:
> Are you perhaps seeing htt
Are you perhaps seeing http://is.gd/6aINHC ? We've moved several Rails
projects to 1.9.2 over the last few months and we've found our builds
running slower on all (we use RSpec too).
Cheers,
Sidu.
http://c42.in
http://about.me/ponnappa
On 25 April 2011 02:44, Alisson Sales wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:44 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Alisson Sales wrote:
>
>> Hi, I've started a Rails 3 project using Ruby 1.9.2 and Rspec 2 and my
>> test suite is now growing and I'm not happy with the amount of time it
>> is tooking to run. I did a benchmark
On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Alisson Sales wrote:
> Hi, I've started a Rails 3 project using Ruby 1.9.2 and Rspec 2 and my
> test suite is now growing and I'm not happy with the amount of time it
> is tooking to run. I did a benchmark of it with Ruby Enterprise
> Edition 1.8.7 2011.03 and it ran m
Hi, I've started a Rails 3 project using Ruby 1.9.2 and Rspec 2 and my
test suite is now growing and I'm not happy with the amount of time it
is tooking to run. I did a benchmark of it with Ruby Enterprise
Edition 1.8.7 2011.03 and it ran much more faster(5x) than Ruby 1.9.2.
Is it expected or the
11 matches
Mail list logo
