Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-06 Thread Luis Lavena
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:04 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> spec_server is one of the hidden gems of the RSpec world. It's not >>> co

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-05 Thread Jim Gay
On Aug 6, 2008, at 12:04 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: spec_server is one of the hidden gems of the RSpec world. It's not completely a slam-dunk to use,

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-05 Thread David Chelimsky
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> spec_server is one of the hidden gems of the RSpec world. It's not >> completely a slam-dunk to use, and I know people who don't use it because of >> va

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-02 Thread Scott Taylor
On Aug 2, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Luis Lavena wrote: On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: spec_server is one of the hidden gems of the RSpec world. It's not completely a slam-dunk to use, and I know people who don't use it because of various problems, but it's wo

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-02 Thread Mark Wilden
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One is the lack of possiblity to actually quit gracefully (they need > to trap INT and properly stop the DRb server. I just do rake spec:server:stop. This is necessary before running rake spec, for instance, since rake spec

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-02 Thread Luis Lavena
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > spec_server is one of the hidden gems of the RSpec world. It's not > completely a slam-dunk to use, and I know people who don't use it because of > various problems, but it's worth working through those problems, especially >

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-02 Thread Mark Wilden
spec_server is one of the hidden gems of the RSpec world. It's not completely a slam-dunk to use, and I know people who don't use it because of various problems, but it's worth working through those problems, especially if you do T/BDD. I've set up a vim script that runs just the current spec, whe

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-02 Thread Dean Radcliffe
Exactly the kind of monkey patch I was looking for - thanks Luis ! I also saw you could edit the spec_server file to make if options[:daemon] into if options[:daemon] and false or something similar, but a no touch solution like yours is nice, and thanks for the Ctrl-Break tip. D Luis Lavena

Re: [rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-02 Thread Luis Lavena
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Dean Radcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Really tired of 30 second startup times to run Test::Unit tests, I would > give my left pinky for a solution to running spec_server on windows. Is > there some monkey patch that can avoid daemonizing the process > altogeth

[rspec-users] Spec Server on Windows - missing fork

2008-08-02 Thread Dean Radcliffe
Really tired of 30 second startup times to run Test::Unit tests, I would give my left pinky for a solution to running spec_server on windows. Is there some monkey patch that can avoid daemonizing the process altogether (Im fine if it runs as any kind of process at all). TIA. Error below - I have op