On Sep 9, 11:16 pm, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
Given /blah/ do
pending
end
I'm not crazy about this feature. We
I love the way I can throw a call to pending() in the top of an
unfinished RSpec example and stop it from failing the build.
Is there a similar way to do such a thing with good ole' cucumber?
cheers,
Matt
http://blog.mattwynne.net
http://songkick.com
In case you wondered: The opinions
Have you tried?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Matt Wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love the way I can throw a call to pending() in the top of an unfinished
RSpec example and stop it from failing the build.
Is there a similar way to do such a thing with good ole' cucumber?
cheers,
Matt
A plain text step with no matching step definition is pending.
Sent from my iPhone
On 9. sep.. 2008, at 19.05, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Have you tried?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Matt Wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I love the way I can throw a call to pending() in
Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
Given /blah/ do
pending
end
Matt - I'm pretty sure that will work - give it a shot, OK?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Aslak Hellesøy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A plain text step with no matching step definition is pending.
Sent from my iPhone
On
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
Given /blah/ do
pending
end
I'm not crazy about this feature. We already have a pending
mechanism for steps (not defining them). What does this bring to the
table over just
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Matt Wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah the trouble is it fails with the following error:
Spec::Example::ExamplePendingError
Which cucumber doesn't understand as anything other than a complete fail.
Our workaround we've arrived at (thanks Aslak for pointing
It's by design, but I'm open for suggestions. David created a similar
ticket yesterday:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211/tickets/8-all-steps-
after-a-failure-are-listed-as-skipped#ticket-8-1
Currently, only a failure (red) will cause subsequent steps to be
skipped.
In case
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:47 PM, aslak hellesoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
Given /blah/ do
pending
end
On 9 Sep 2008, at 21:34, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, David Chelimsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:47 PM, aslak hellesoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aslak - I think Matt is
aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aslak - I think Matt is looking for this:
Given /blah/ do
pending
end
I'm not crazy about this feature. We already have a pending
mechanism for steps (not defining them).
11 matches
Mail list logo
