Re: [rspec-users] expect_render, why does there need to be a warning

2007-08-15 Thread Zach Dennis
On 8/15/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/15/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis

Re: [rspec-users] expect_render, why does there need to be a warning

2007-08-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a warning on the web site about expect_render and stub_render: WARNING: expect_render and stub_render, while very useful, act

[rspec-users] expect_render, why does there need to be a warning

2007-08-13 Thread Zach Dennis
There is a warning on the web site about expect_render and stub_render: WARNING: expect_render and stub_render, while very useful, act differently from standard Message Expectations (a.k.a. mock expectations), which would never pass calls through to the real object. This can be very confusing