Re: [rspec-users] have_same_elements_of proposal

2009-10-28 Thread Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
Excelent, Pat. Is this operator documented somewhere? Thank you, Rodrigo. Em 29-10-2009 00:16, Pat Maddox escreveu: Already in. [1,2].should =~ [2,1] Pat On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote: How about having this matcher along the default available matcher

Re: [rspec-users] have_same_elements_of proposal

2009-10-28 Thread Pat Maddox
Already in. [1,2].should =~ [2,1] Pat On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote: > How about having this matcher along the default available matchers? > > require 'set' > Spec::Matchers.define :have_same_elements_of do |expected| >  match do |actual| >    expected.to_set ==

[rspec-users] have_same_elements_of proposal

2009-10-28 Thread Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
How about having this matcher along the default available matchers? require 'set' Spec::Matchers.define :have_same_elements_of do |expected| match do |actual| expected.to_set == actual.to_set end end Example: [1,2].should have_same_elements_of([2,1]) Best Regards, Rodrigo. __