Re: [rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

2011-11-15 Thread Pat Maddox
On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: > > Can anyone suggest a better way? Really tough to follow that example, so apologies if I'm off. I use the template method pattern for stuff like this. My shared example group references a method that isn't implemented. Example groups tha

Re: [rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

2011-11-15 Thread David Chelimsky
On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:59 PM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: >> Use the described class: >> >> shared_examples "a nameable thingie" do |klass| >> describe "#build_name" do >>it "it adds the collection of arguments to the base components and >> formats them for a form element name attribute" do >

Re: [rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

2011-11-14 Thread Patrick J. Collins
> Use the described class: > > shared_examples "a nameable thingie" do |klass| > describe "#build_name" do > it "it adds the collection of arguments to the base components and > formats them for a form element name attribute" do > described_class.new(nil,nil).build_name(:lol, :lollers

Re: [rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

2011-11-14 Thread David Chelimsky
On Nov 14, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: > So, I recognize that there are many different ways to accomplish what I am > trying to do, but none of them seem to be as elegant as I would like. > > I have a few classes which need to have shared functionality... > > So I could do someth

Re: [rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

2011-11-14 Thread Patrick J. Collins
> Having trouble following your example. Why do you have to pass > Bar.new(nil, nil) for this test? Because the shared example is testing the method #build_name from the module that is included in the various classes-- it needs the object that #build_name is attached to in order to test the funct

Re: [rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

2011-11-14 Thread Cynthia Kiser
Quoting Patrick J. Collins : > describe Bar do > it_behaves_like "a nameable thingie", Bar.new(nil, nil) > end > > Which I don't like, mainly because Foo & Bar's initialize methods require > arguments, and I am having to do (nil, nil) which seems very uncool... Having trouble following your exa

[rspec-users] need some advice on the best way to structure testable shared methods

2011-11-14 Thread Patrick J. Collins
So, I recognize that there are many different ways to accomplish what I am trying to do, but none of them seem to be as elegant as I would like. I have a few classes which need to have shared functionality... So I could do something like this: module NameBuilder def build_name(*args) args