On 10 Oct 2008, at 21:18, Anita Anita wrote:
but I can't make it public.
Why not? Who are you afraid is going to call it that shouldn't?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Well, it's a methods for buying with credit card info and everything. So
I wanted to test it to make sure that all my code works but I can't make
it public.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.
Anita Anita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Can I test private methods directly?
> Or should I pass by the methods that are calling these private methods?
> Or can I make the method private after testing?
> What is the best way?
>
> Thank you
The party line is not to test private methods.
IMHO, one should never directly test a private method. So I prefer the
second way you mentioned in your email.
Better yet, think of why you want to test a private method. Is it too
complicated? If this is the case, way too often this private method should
not really belong to the class it's curren
Hi,
Can I test private methods directly?
Or should I pass by the methods that are calling these private methods?
Or can I make the method private after testing?
What is the best way?
Thank you
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users m