On 30/04/2009, at 7:59 AM, Kero van Gelder wrote:
So basically, I want to do something like this:
examples = load_examples_without_running
examples.each {|example| puts example.description}
[snip]
I'm working into a big corporate in Australia, and they are demanding
traceability of tests b
>>> So basically, I want to do something like this:
>>>
>>> examples = load_examples_without_running
>>> examples.each {|example| puts example.description}
[snip]
> I'm working into a big corporate in Australia, and they are demanding
> traceability of tests back to requirements. I'm already u
[snip]
I'm really sorry about this, but I just couldn't wait for tonight to
add this:
http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/commit/a4b3aac62e940c50077bdeb7d9ad5ee11e02116d
The release *will* have to wait for tonight, but you can easily build
the gem locally: http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Marty Andrews wrote:
>
> On 29/04/2009, at 9:41 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Marty Andrews
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews
wrote:
On 29/04/2009, at 9:41 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Marty Andrews
wrote:
On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews >
wrote:
I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
running them
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Marty Andrews wrote:
>
> On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
>>> running them, so I can traverse the object tree an
On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews
wrote:
I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
running them, so I can traverse the object tree and get descriptions
etc. I'm finding it tricky to figure out how to do th
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews wrote:
> I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
> running them, so I can traverse the object tree and get descriptions
> etc. I'm finding it tricky to figure out how to do that though.
> There seems to be an inherent assumpt
On 29 Apr 2009, at 07:23, Marty Andrews wrote:
I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
running them, so I can traverse the object tree and get descriptions
etc. I'm finding it tricky to figure out how to do that though.
There seems to be an inherent assumption in the f
