On 6 Jan 2009, at 13:02, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Reza Primardiansyah > wrote:
Aslak,
The best time I get is 6.3 seconds. I'm using "time script/server"
command and hitting Ctrl-C immediately after I see "** Use CTRL-C to
stop."
Ok, so you have 5 seconds of
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Reza Primardiansyah <
reza.primardians...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aslak,
> The best time I get is 6.3 seconds. I'm using "time script/server" command
> and hitting Ctrl-C immediately after I see "** Use CTRL-C to stop."
>
Ok, so you have 5 seconds of additional overhea
Aslak,
The best time I get is 6.3 seconds. I'm using "time script/server" command
and hitting Ctrl-C immediately after I see "** Use CTRL-C to stop."
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:43 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Reza Primardiansyah <
> reza.primardians...@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> > I use spec rather than script/spec to run specs. script/spec runs my
> specs
> > twice.
>
> That's fixed, so I'm guessing you've got a mixture of old and new
> generated files.
>
I did re-gen with .16, but still got that result.
> The p
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> Mark, would you mind explicitly telling us/me how you get the ``spec''
>> command to run within DRb, please?
>
> I use spec rather than script/spec to run specs. script/spec runs my spec
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
>
> Mark, would you mind explicitly telling us/me how you get the ``spec''
> command to run within DRb, please?
>
I use spec rather than script/spec to run specs. script/spec runs my specs
twice. I also use rake spec:server:start rather than sc
On 2009-01-03, at 23:17, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Reza Primardiansyah > wrote:
I found out that running RSpec on Rails takes too much overhead. It
takes more than 16s per run although the specs only take less than
6s, like seen below.
The killer is the time it tak
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Reza Primardiansyah <
reza.primardians...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
> I found out that running RSpec on Rails takes too much overhead. It takes
> more than 16s per run although the specs only take less than 6s, like seen
> below. That means almost 11s overhead.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Reza Primardiansyah <
reza.primardians...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found out that running RSpec on Rails takes too much overhead. It takes
> more than 16s per run although the specs only take less than 6s, like seen
> below.
The killer is the time it takes to load e
