On 7/3/07, Patrick Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think @header may not be an implementation detail in this case.
>
> If your layout looks like this:
>
> ...
>
> <%= @header || 'Default Title' %>
>
> ...
>
> And the view we are testing looks like this:
>
> ...
> <%= @
On 2 Jul 2007, at 10:22, David Chelimsky wrote:
> IIRC, part of the facet idea was to prepend the facet text to the
> descriptive string:
>
> describe XP do
> facet "pair programming" do
> it "should work better when team members have breath mints" do
> end
> end
> end
>
> XP
> - (pai
On 7/4/07, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2 Jul 2007, at 10:22, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > IIRC, part of the facet idea was to prepend the facet text to the
> > descriptive string:
> >
> > describe XP do
> > facet "pair programming" do
> > it "should work better when team me
aslak hellesoy wrote:
On 7/3/07, Patrick Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I think @header may not be an implementation detail in this case.
If your layout looks like this:
...
<%= @header || 'Default Title' %>
...
And the view we are testing looks like this:
...
<%= @h
On 7/4/07, Patrick Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On 7/3/07, Patrick Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think @header may not be an implementation detail in this case.
>
> If your layout looks like this:
>
> ...
>
> <%= @header || 'Default Ti
David Chelimsky wrote:
On 7/4/07, Patrick Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
aslak hellesoy wrote:
On 7/3/07, Patrick Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I think @header may not be an implementation detail in this case.
If your layout looks like this:
...
<%= @header || 'Defa
I can sympathize with not wanting to just verify the final html
output, even though it would probably be sufficient in this simple case.
I'm a big fan of helpers for any logic in views, even simple stuff
like this. If you had a couple of methods in your ApplicationHelper
that handled settin
Hi Don,
Thanks for the tip! That looks like a great way to handle this case.
So what does everybody think, is this the definitive answer for setting
instance variables in your views? (use a helper) or are their cases
where we may still want to check instance variables in view specs?
Cheers!
On 7/4/07, Patrick Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Don,
>
> Thanks for the tip! That looks like a great way to handle this case.
>
> So what does everybody think, is this the definitive answer for setting
> instance variables in your views? (use a helper) or are their cases where we
>
