On Jan 12, 2008 8:35 PM, Jay Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >because if you have integration tests covering everything,
> >then you'll know pretty quickly when your tests aren't up to par.
>
> If we have integration tests that cover everything then why have another set
> of tests? At that po
Hi all, I have a method calling Klass.create! two times with different
arguments (this happens in a class reponsable for reading in a csv file)
I want to test those like this:
in one test: Klass.should_receive(:create!).with(:name => "foo").once
in another: Klass.should_receive(:create!).with(:
On Jan 13, 2008 6:56 AM, Ivo Dancet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, I have a method calling Klass.create! two times with different
> arguments (this happens in a class reponsable for reading in a csv file)
>
> I want to test those like this:
>
> in one test: Klass.should_receive(:create!).with
Ok,
found the problem after trying to make an example: I forgot to add a
stub! to accept the second call to create!
I didn't find it sooner because the error was:
Mock 'Class' expected :create! with ({:name=>"foo"}) but received it
with ({:name=>"foo2"})
And it did get it with ({:name => "fo
> Jay - are you familiar with Acceptance Test Driven
> Development/Planning and/or Test Driven Development?
I am with TDD and Acceptance testing (not sure if this is the same as
Acceptance Test Driven Development) . I use a more classic approach to use
Martin Fowler's terminology which is why I
I've been getting my head around view spec'ing lately for a fairly
complex project that makes heavy use of partials in views and I have hit
up against a style puzzle.
I see two strategies for spec'ing views:
First:
Develop detailed specs for each partial and then make sure that the
final view e
I don't have a lot of experience yet with the view spec'ing, but I do have
the first way I will start:
Spec a view from the outermost level and Treat extracted partials as a
hybrid of "Extract Method" and "Extract Class"
This means that I would spec out the top-most view, extract a partial to
remo
Hey all,
I have a spec that is hanging when it is running.
How do I get the rspec runner to show what specs it's running so I can
which one is hanging? I am calling the runner from my rails project.
Thanks,
Ben
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-user
There is also a problem with spaces in the file path to ruby or the spec
files when running on windows. A quick dumb fix:
- change the return result of the ruby method of autotest.rb
def ruby
ruby = File.join(Config::CONFIG['bindir'],
Config::CONFIG['ruby_install_name
Ben Greenberg wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a spec that is hanging when it is running.
>
> How do I get the rspec runner to show what specs it's running so I can
> which one is hanging? I am calling the runner from my rails project.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
> _
When I work with a .html.erb file, the autotest rspec on rails stuff doesn't
understand the file to map it to the right test. I wanted to submit a patch
for this, but I'm unsure where the specs would be to update. I found the
necessary mapping in rspec_autotest.rb, but I can't find any specs anywhe
On Jan 13, 2008 3:51 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I work with a .html.erb file, the autotest rspec on rails stuff doesn't
> understand the file to map it to the right test. I wanted to submit a patch
> for this, but I'm unsure where the specs would be to update. I found the
>
Okay, thanks.
On Jan 13, 2008 4:54 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008 3:51 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I work with a .html.erb file, the autotest rspec on rails stuff
> doesn't
> > understand the file to map it to the right test. I wanted to
Seems like the recently updated (and wonderful) textmate bundle does not
take into account running individual tests that are in nested specs.
Anybody else notice this? Any ideas?
Matt
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforg
On Jan 14, 2008 12:47 AM, Matthew Windwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like the recently updated (and wonderful) textmate bundle does not
> take into account running individual tests that are in nested specs.
>
> Anybody else notice this? Any ideas?
>
I have noticed it too. Please file a bug
On Jan 13, 2008 5:47 PM, Matthew Windwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like the recently updated (and wonderful) textmate bundle does not
> take into account running individual tests that are in nested specs.
>
> Anybody else notice this? Any ideas?
There's an open ticket on this at the light
> > I have a spec that is hanging when it is running.
> >
> > How do I get the rspec runner to show what specs it's running so I can
> > which one is hanging? I am calling the runner from my rails project.
>
> Which formatter ate you using? If you use the specdoc formatter it will
> output the
I get this
Dunno! app/views/coupon/index.html.erb
On Jan 13, 2008 5:29 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, thanks.
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2008 4:54 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 13, 2008 3:51 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > When I work
Set $VERBOSE=false in your .autotest file in your home directory.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec 1.1
rspec_on_rails 1.1
rails 2.0.2
On Jan 13, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Corey Haines wrote:
I get this
Dunno! app/views/coupon/index.html.erb
On Jan 13, 2008 5:29 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTEC
Awesome! That worked perfectly, Nathan! Thanks.
-Corey
On Jan 13, 2008 10:11 PM, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Set $VERBOSE=false in your .autotest file in your home directory.
> Nathan Sutton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rspec 1.1
> rspec_on_rails 1.1
> rails 2.0.2
>
> On Jan 13, 2008, at
On Jan 13, 2008 9:14 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Awesome! That worked perfectly, Nathan! Thanks.
There will soon (like in the next day or two I think) be a ZenTest
release which will make setting $VERBOSE obsolete. By default you
won't get the Dunno messages, but you can choose t
Okay. Thanks for the help, guys. I'm back on track!
On Jan 13, 2008 10:33 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008 9:14 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Awesome! That worked perfectly, Nathan! Thanks.
>
> There will soon (like in the next day or two I think)
Awesome David, yeah I was quite surprised that verbose was on by
default in 3.7.2.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec 1.1
rspec_on_rails 1.1
rails 2.0.2
On Jan 13, 2008, at 9:33 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008 9:14 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Awesome! That wo
23 matches
Mail list logo
