On 31-mrt-2008, at 18:22, Ashley Moran wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2008, Bart Zonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having the same problem, also with controllers. Weird part is, I
> mostly have it at work, running OS 10.4, but not at home, running
> 10.5. My environment is the same, except for the O
On 01/04/2008, Bart Zonneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> According to 'svn up', it's revision for both rspec and
> rspec_on_rails. Both at home and at work.
Hmm, exact same revision as me. Are we the only one s having problems?
I've also noticed errors along the lines of "ActionContr
On 01/04/2008, Jed Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there an easy way to stub an instance method for every new instance of
> a given class? I suppose I could just redefine the method, but I'm wondering
> if the RSpec mocking framework has this built in.
Hi Jed
I hate it when other people a
I think the general consensus is that if you need this feature, then
you have ugly code that needs cleaning up :) If you're in a situation
like me, where you're too noob to figure out a better solution for
some legacy code that you inherited, go to this url and find the
instructions for in
I tried to post this to the devel list but it never seemed to get
through. So I'm posting it here in the hope that someone from the
development team will notice:
Hello,
I noticed that you are using spaces in all the snippets in the
TextMate bundle. I have TM set to 4 spaces and when I use the RSp
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Ollie Saunders
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to post this to the devel list but it never seemed to get
> through. So I'm posting it here in the hope that someone from the
> development team will notice:
If you want the dev team to notice, please post a tic
Haha, that's about the response I was expecting; I asked with some
trepidation. I'm just looking for a quick hack to short-circuit Merb's
render method to do some view/controller isolation testing until Merb
officially supports it. I can't just stub methods on @controller (like in
Rails) because th
Could you stub out Controller.new and return your mock?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Jed Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haha, that's about the response I was expecting; I asked with some
> trepidation. I'm just looking for a quick hack to short-circuit Merb's
> render method to do some view
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you stub out Controller.new and return your mock?
Bingo.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Jed Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Haha, that's about the response I was expecting; I asked with some
> trepidation
Hi y'all
The problem is probably because I'm a newb. I have a home controller in the
admin namespace.
My controller spec is working as expected, and the following example is
passing:
it "should show the home page if logged in" do
controller.send("current_user=", User.new)
get :index
Hi,
Made a little progress here. In one of my "given" steps I was posting to
the login action. when I take this post out (and make other changes
required), the should render_template works correctly. It's as though the
earlier post in the given step is meaning that the response isn't set
corre
I'm not sure how that would work. For controller specs, I want to keep most
of the controller intact so that I can verify its actual behavior. Am I
missing something?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:12 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL
And I suspect this is because @first_render isn't being set for subsequent
renders but it's time to go home now.
On 02/04/2008, Tim Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Made a little progress here. In one of my "given" steps I was posting to
> the login action. when I take this post
Hi there,
Given my recent problems with .should render_template after a second post,
I'm wondering if there's a way I set the state as logged in inside a given
step without posting to sessions/create? I can't seem to directly set
sessions[:user_id]. I'm using restful_authentication.
This is
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Tim Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Given my recent problems with .should render_template after a second post,
> I'm wondering if there's a way I set the state as logged in inside a given
> step without posting to sessions/create?
Why not just post
Hi David.
That does the login. So - yes - probably.
I had thought it was breaking the "should render_template" that I make after
the subsequent post, but maybe something else is causing that to break..
Tim.
On 02/04/2008, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:
16 matches
Mail list logo
