On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Phlip wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> When RSpec is used as customer facing, they see the docstrings
>> (strings passed to describe() and it()), not the internal code. That's
>> for developers.
>
> Then why the .should stuff? I'm a developer - technically - an
>
> Ok, so I tried just sticking an "ENV['HTTPS'] = 'on'" in my
> spec/spec_helper.rb file and re-running my spec suite. Looks like this is
> not enough in itself, as I got about 77 spec failures, all of them
> apparently caused by "ssl?" returning false and producing unwanted
> redirects.
>
Rails
Forgive the long post, just looking for input/advice/alternate
opinions..
Like many I think that going through the exercise of framing user
requests in Cucumber terms(Features, Scenarios..) really helps
facilitate necessary conversations and avoid time wasted implementing
the wrong thing(
On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Lenny Marks wrote:
Forgive the long post, just looking for input/advice/alternate
opinions..
Like many I think that going through the exercise of framing user
requests in Cucumber terms(Features, Scenarios..) really helps
facilitate necessary conversations an
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Nathan Wilmes wrote:
> A few of our tests attempt to test controllers with production-style
> rescuing. Before the current rspec/Rails 2.2.2 combo, it was fairly easy to
> set up for these tests:
>
> it "should throw a 404 for strange actions" do
> controller.us
sorry to bump this up, I am the only one experiencing this problem?
anybody else running cucumber in other languages?
2009/2/14 Oliver Barnes :
> Hello,
>
> I've just installed cucumber 0.1.99, and it looks like the Portuguese
> step keywords aren't recognized for some reason. I'm following this
>
On 15 Feb 2009, at 19:47, Ben Mabey wrote:
To illustrate what Zach is saying here is an example I used on the
wiki[1] before:
# Global setup
ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :test
ActionMailer::Base.perform_deliveries = true
Before do
# Scenario setup
ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.c
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Ashley Moran
wrote:
>
> On 15 Feb 2009, at 19:47, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
>> To illustrate what Zach is saying here is an example I used on the wiki[1]
>> before:
>>
>> # Global setup
>> ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :test
>> ActionMailer::Base.perform_deliveries
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Oliver Barnes
wrote:
> sorry to bump this up, I am the only one experiencing this problem?
> anybody else running cucumber in other languages?
Oi Oliver,
Poderia ver o codigo aqui:
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/blob/e1afbf1908fdb3867d857478847403abeedd
Hello,
according to this post:
http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2009/1/13/rspec-1-1-12-is-released
I should be able to write:
describe User do
it {should valdate_presence_of(:login)}
end
with rspec 1.1.12
But I got:
NO NAME
undefined method `valdate_presence_of' for
#
What did I do it wrong?
Sorry for the spam, I relized there was a typo. It should be
it {should validate_presence_of(:login)}
It still didn't work
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> according to this post:
> http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2009/1/13/rspec-1-1-12-is-released
>
> I should b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> Sorry for the spam, I relized there was a typo. It should be
>it {should validate_presence_of(:login)}
> It still didn't work
Scrolling up a bit ...
"There are a few matcher libraries out there like
rspec-on-rails-matchers that provide m
according to this post:
http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2009/1/13/rspec-1-1-12-is-released
I should be able to write:
describe User do
it {should valdate_presence_of(:login)}
end
with rspec 1.1.12
But I got:
NO NAME
undefined method `valdate_presence_of' for
#
Hi Yi,
I believe you're
ah! sorry, my bad. Thanks!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:56 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> > Sorry for the spam, I relized there was a typo. It should be
> >it {should validate_presence_of(:login)}
> > It still didn't work
>
> Scrolling up a bit
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> ah! sorry, my bad. Thanks!
No worries - I always just read the code first too :)
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:56 PM, David Chelimsky
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
>> > Sorry for the spam, I relized there was a ty
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Ashley Moran
wrote:
>
> On 15 Feb 2009, at 19:47, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
>> To illustrate what Zach is saying here is an example I used on the wiki[1]
>> before:
>>
>> # Global setup
>> ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :test
>> ActionMailer::Base.perform_deliverie
16 matches
Mail list logo
