On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Phlip wrote:
> So what's the maximum number of cucumber features that anyone has ever seen
> on-deck but not yet passing? That's a bad metric, exactly like excess
> inventory in a warehouse.
I don't know that it's bad. At the beginning of an iteration, I have
mos
*smacks forehead* Who would have known. Ha! I spent the entire weekend
"debugging" that lib.
Now, how do I create a rake task that runs autospec with a few options?
On 20/02/2009, at 15:56, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Christian Hoeppner
wrote:
Hey there,
I've t
I am just starting with any testing really, but I chose this post as a
tutorial.
http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2008/12/rails-2-day-3-behavior-driven-development/comment-page-1/#comment-454
I have WinXP, so I had to install one more gem for the colors.
After making my first features/tasklist
Hoor Net wrote:
I am just starting with any testing really, but I chose this post as a
tutorial.
http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2008/12/rails-2-day-3-behavior-driven-development/comment-page-1/#comment-454
I have WinXP, so I had to install one more gem for the colors.
After making my first
It works! It works!
Thanks a LOT!!!
Joseph Wilk wrote:
> Hoor Net wrote:
>>
>> Take a look at the result:
>> http://gist.github.com/68907
>>
>> The 'a' letters ARE MISSING
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
> Take a look at:
>
> http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/troubleshooting
>
> --
> Jos
aslak hellesoy wrote:
So what's the maximum number of cucumber features that anyone has ever seen
on-deck but not yet passing? That's a bad metric, exactly like excess
inventory in a warehouse.
Do you mean "on filesystem"? I have used Cucumber on 5-6 projects now,
and I never exceed 1. If ther
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Christian Hoeppner
wrote:
> *smacks forehead* Who would have known. Ha! I spent the entire weekend
> "debugging" that lib.
>
> Now, how do I create a rake task that runs autospec with a few options?
RSpec options, Autotest options, or both?
>
> On 20/02/2009, at
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:49 PM, aidy lewis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this seems all take and no give, but do we have an estimated
> final release date for Cucumber 0.2?
>
I'm afraid I can't give a release date. 0.2 is fixed(ish) scope, and
therefore time can't be fixed at the same time. I have a l
I'd question the wisdom of checking into an integration server every couple
of minutes. I'm not sure if you meant that but if you did then I think these
sort of checkins have to be in bigger chunks. The reason is that each
checkin to an intergration server is asking my colleagues to checkout my
cod
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> I'd question the wisdom of checking into an integration server every couple
> of minutes.
Our mantra is ABC: Always Be Committing. So we commit anytime we feel
like it, as long as it doesn't break the build. This makes life a lot
easier wh
I'm not really sure what options autotest has, since the website is on
"coming soon", and autotest -h doesn't show any help, so I'm thinking
about rspec options, like the rpsec command to use, arguments (--diff
unified --color, etc).
Is there a place to read up on autotest behavior and opti
Mark Wilden wrote:
I'd question the wisdom of checking into an integration server every couple
of minutes.
Our mantra is ABC: Always Be Committing. So we commit anytime we feel
like it, as long as it doesn't break the build. This makes life a lot
easier when there is merging to do.
In a post
Jon Hunt wrote:
> Announcement for new group for Vim users.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/vim-on-rails?hl=en
>
> Sharing vim usage for Ruby on Rails development. Includes any platform
> (Windows, Linux and Mac). Discuss anything related to Ruby and Ruby on
> Rails development. (migration f
Hello,
I am trying to implement the following scenario, but I am stuck ...
The thing is I want to initialize a variable @comment when the stub
function "find_comment" is called.
The way I do it below doesn't work, since
"before_filter :find_comment" returns true/false and @comment
initialization i
I'm trying to set my request body in my tests (the application is a
web service that takes large XML files in PUT requests).
If you do this:
put :update, :body => xml
You get a request with an empty body, and a field in the header called
"body" set to the XML. You can set the body date in contr
Hello everybody!
Im wondering what is the best way of specing action with send file
such as:
def download
log = ActivityLog.find(params[:id])
if log
send_file log.path
else
flash[:notice] = _("Log file \"#{params[:id]}\" was not found.")
redirect_to :action => 'ind
Hey there,
I've tried using Nick Sieger's "plugin" to have autotest run my tests
for gems and other non-rails stuff. However, it doesn't seem to match
any tests for any files. Not being sure what was wrong, I traced the
execution of RspecAutotest.run() and saw that tests_for_file() never
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Christian Hoeppner
wrote:
> I'm not really sure what options autotest has, since the website is on
> "coming soon", and autotest -h doesn't show any help, so I'm thinking about
> rspec options, like the rpsec command to use, arguments (--diff unified
> --color, etc
James,
Personally I think your missing the point entirely about BDD. The
fundamental idea of BDD is to drive/guide the relationship between the
customer and developer. So you shouldn't be having meetings with customers
that arrive with
" the idea of "client" being that of an ephemeral "role" assi
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> I'd question the wisdom of checking into an integration server every couple
> of minutes. I'm not sure if you meant that but if you did then I think these
> sort of checkins have to be in bigger chunks.
To me the answer is just what Zach sa
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:45 PM, vo.x wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Im wondering what is the best way of specing action with send file
> such as:
I'd probably do it on two fronts. On the unit test level, you can
stub it in your setup so that it won't try to send that file every
time you run test
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark Wilden wrote:
>
> Our mantra is ABC: Always Be Committing. So we commit anytime we feel
> like it, as long as it doesn't break the build. This makes life a lot
> easier when there is merging to do.
I think your "doesn't break the build" condition is a lot bi
Just on a side note, how many features / stories have people seen on
their projects and how much of their project was covered by
features/stories? I refrain from the terms average and typical because,
there ain't no much thing. But I would be interested in getting an idea
of how many feature
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
> The focus has to first be about getting your customer really
> into producing features with you. If you achieve that then what should
> happen is
>
> 1. You and your custoimer meet often and work (rather than just talk)
> together and pro
Andrew Premdas wrote:
>
> n.b. I'm expressing my opinions forcefully without much regard to tact
> or diplomacy. No offense in any way is intended :)
>
None taken. I am trying, desperately, to move from one way of thinking
to another. I expect it to be a painful process.
I am afraid the way
On 22/02/2009, at 3:34 PM, vo.x wrote:
Hello all,
Is there some best practice how to test Rails controller action which
is using send_file method? Could you help me please?
Vit
On 23/02/2009, at 2:43 AM, vo.x wrote:
Just to be clear, this is how the action looks:
def download
log = Act
Stephen Eley wrote:
>
> ...So that's my reality. Cucumber for collaboration isn't the value
> for me. I suspect that there are a *lot* of companies out there with
> one-person IT departments that may fit into my situation, and
> certainly a whole ton of personal projects where there was never a
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM, James Byrne wrote:
>
> F=31, S=165, PC=100%, TU=30, CU=21, financial services (insurance
> claims)
Whathuh? Wow, you really *do* work for government, don't you? >8->
That line hurts me to look at and I'm not going to try to put my
answer in that format.
Since
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Evgeny Bogdanov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to implement the following scenario, but I am stuck ...
> The thing is I want to initialize a variable @comment when the stub
> function "find_comment" is called.
> The way I do it below doesn't work, since
> "before
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark Wilden wrote:
>>
>> Our mantra is ABC: Always Be Committing. So we commit anytime we feel
>> like it, as long as it doesn't break the build. This makes life a lot
>> easier when there is merging to do.
>
James Byrne wrote:
Just on a side note, how many features / stories have people seen on
their projects and how much of their project was covered by
features/stories?
My current day job is old-school Rails. Some of the tests - written before I got
here - used a most despicable pattern. Someo
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Stephen Eley wrote:
>>
>> I think your "doesn't break the build" condition is a lot bigger than
>> you make it sound. >8-> What's the definition of "the build" in your
>> work culture? Do you run all tests e
Stephen Eley wrote:
>
> I'm the technology director for a non-profit academic society. My
> organization has 15 employees. I'm the one who knows anything at all
> about computers. When I came on, I delegated *to myself* the
> responsibility of getting rid of our current excremental Web site,
>
Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM, James Byrne
> wrote:
>>
>> F=31, S=165, PC=100%, TU=30, CU=21, financial services (insurance
>> claims)
>
> Whathuh? Wow, you really *do* work for government, don't you? >8->
> That line hurts me to look at and I'm not going to try to put
I thought other people might be interested in these step definitions.
They allow you to write steps like:
Given the following "turkeys" exist:
|name |size |intelligence|
|marko |big |dumb|
|mello |small |smart|
Or,
Then the following "turkeys" should exist:
...
James,
If this is the case then to do BDD well you have to simulate the dialogue
between customer and developer. At the moment you are so thinking like a
developer so you are starting with detailed technical features rather than
general customer features. Also you're using such complicated languag
Stephen,
It appears that James situation is similar to yours which is very different
to what I assumed. I've written a response (rant) about addressing his
problems in that context. Personally I still think that you have to start
with fundamental customer produced features. As you and James are on
Comment inline
2009/2/23 Mark Wilden
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Andrew Premdas
> wrote:
>
> > I'd question the wisdom of checking into an integration server every
> couple
> > of minutes.
>
> Our mantra is ABC: Always Be Committing. So we commit anytime we feel
> like it, as long as it
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:26 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Christian Hoeppner
> wrote:
>> Is there a place to read up on autotest behavior and options? I couldn't
>> even find a manpage, but maybe I'm not looking hard enough.
>
> There's not much to look at other t
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:04 PM, James Byrne wrote:
>>
>> I'm the technology director for a non-profit academic society. My
>> organization has 15 employees.
>
> I occurs to me that you might find a look at Redmine
> (http://www.redmine.org) worthwhile. If not to use then at least for
> implemen
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>>
>> Just because I push doesn't mean my coworkers have to pull.
>
> Yes it does, surely you can't be saying you can commit to an integration
> server without pulling the code from it first
I can't and I didn't. :)
///ark
__
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:57 PM, James Byrne wrote:
>
> Total users vs. concurrent users gives a very good idea of the resources
> behind a project, or at least the potential resources, together with an
> idea of how important to a business that a project might be.
If you say so. Personally I do
42 matches
Mail list logo
