Hi,
Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
1. Test the behavior in a mixin object that includes the module because
its the behavior of the object thats important not the code structure.
2. Test the module
On 14 Aug 2010, at 11:34, Mike Howson wrote:
Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
Hi Mike
I've been doing a lot of this sort of coding lately, as I've been extracting
duplicated code into a
On Aug 14, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Mike Howson wrote:
Hi,
Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
1. Test the behavior in a mixin object that includes the module because
its the behavior of the object
On Aug 14, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On 14 Aug 2010, at 11:34, Mike Howson wrote:
Just wondered what people thoughts are to testing module's to be
included in mixin's? Seems to me there are two main approaches:-
Hi Mike
I've been doing a lot of this sort of coding
On 13 Aug 2010, at 22:16, Don French wrote:
Not sure what you meant by did you turn it off and on again?
Ah, I just meant I was running out of ideas[1].
The other information is here:
http://pastie.org/1091155
All I can suggest is maybe updating RVM and trying in Ruby 1.9.2 with a fresh
Nin wrote:
Hi! I'm new to rspec and was wondering how named_scopes are usually
tested? Is it enough to test that it's defined? or do you need to test
the behavior as well? I've been reading around and this seems to be
the tester's choice, i just want to get people's opinion on this :D
Here is
Just released 0.5.0, a pretty stable release with a large rspec test
suite to show it off and ensure it works as it should :)
On Aug 11, 6:02 pm, Kristian Mandrup kmandrup.git...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now with an almost complete test suite to ensure it all works as it
should and to demonstrate how
Thought that was what you meant, but did not want to leave anything
untried. I have updated to 1.9.2-rc2. same problem. I am going to
have to do an update to snow leopard soon, may try it and put new code
on not just restore.
Don French
On Aug 14, 4:40 am, Ashley Moran
On 14 Aug 2010, at 18:49, Don French wrote:
Thought that was what you meant, but did not want to leave anything
untried. I have updated to 1.9.2-rc2. same problem. I am going to
have to do an update to snow leopard soon, may try it and put new code
on not just restore.
I wish I could help
