Hello everyone,
I have a "before_save" at the top of my model, and it is being used
correctly. However, when testing with RSpec/Rcov, my callback method is
not being tested. Is there something specific I need to be doing?
Thank you,
Andrew Davis
NASA - KSC
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.c
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a "before_save" at the top of my model, and it is being used
> correctly. However, when testing with RSpec/Rcov, my callback method is
> not being tested. Is there something specific I need to be doing?
Can't tell w
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Toni Tuominen wrote:
> I'd like to know how to debug callers with message expectations. I
> have a message expectation that should be called only once but for
> some reason is called 13 times and I'd like to know where it's called
> from. I've made the expectation
Okay, I didn't think you needed to see any code since it seems general.
And I meant "after_save" not "before_save".
I guess it's kind of complicated since I have a lot of associations, but
hopefully this will help you.
My model
class TaskOrder < ActiveRecord::Base
after_update :save_product_gro
On Nov 15, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Okay, I didn't think you needed to see any code since it seems general.
Even if it's hypothetical, it's always better to post code so we have context
for a conversation. The general answer to "RSpec is not testing my filters" is
"you're doing
Worked like a charm.
Thanks again Mr. Chelimsky
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Thank you David for your prompt response. I completely understand what
you're getting at regarding the posting of code as well.
I think you may have solved my problem, I'll give it a go later today. I
appreciate it!
Thanks,
Andrew Davis
NASA - KSC
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
__
Hello all,
I'm on the final stretch of testing my model, and I've realized that one
simple line isn't being tested. I was hoping to get some insight on what
I can do to accomplish this. The line that isn't being covered by Rcov
is the ".sum". See code here:
Test:
http://pastie.org/private/djdqtma
On Nov 15, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm on the final stretch of testing my model, and I've realized that one
> simple line isn't being tested. I was hoping to get some insight on what
> I can do to accomplish this. The line that isn't being covered by Rcov
> is the "
Scratch this.
It has been noted that rcov has a hard time distinguishing what the last
line is.
If I put all of the code in that model on one line, it works great.
Thanks!
Andrew Davis
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users maili
I've posted this to the Authlogic group but things seem a little quiet, so
perhaps someone here can help:
'm testing Authlogic 2.1.6, running under Rails 3.0.1., using rspec
2.1.0
I have the following:
user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authentic do |config|
config.login_field
I'm having problems getting rspec-rails 2 request specs to work with
webrat. Any help would be appreciated. Here's my setup:
ruby 1.9.2p0
rails 3.0.1
rspec-rails 2.1.0
webrat 0.7.2
Here's the error I'm getting:
$ rspec --backtrace spec/requests/ssl_certificate_requests_spec.rb
F
Failures:
1)
On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Peter Havens wrote:
> I'm having problems getting rspec-rails 2 request specs to work with
> webrat. Any help would be appreciated. Here's my setup:
>
> ruby 1.9.2p0
> rails 3.0.1
> rspec-rails 2.1.0
> webrat 0.7.2
>
> Here's the error I'm getting:
>
> $ rspec --bac
In class, to give people a feel for how stubs work, I used to do this
with rspec 1.x:
sarah:~$ gem list rspec
*** LOCAL GEMS ***
rspec (1.3.0)
rspec-rails (1.3.2)
sarah:~$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [universal-darwin10.0]
sarah:~$ irb
>> require 'spec'
=> true
>> require 'spe
Hi friends
in my rspec_controller
1...@user.articles.should_receive(:find_by_id).with('1').and_return(@article)
get :show,:id => 1
in above example 1 if i mention get :show, :id => 1 below the
schould_receive
it is working fine
but
2]get :show,:id => 1
@user.articles.should_receive(:find_by_i
On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Sarah Allen wrote:
> In class, to give people a feel for how stubs work, I used to do this
> with rspec 1.x:
>
> sarah:~$ gem list rspec
>
> *** LOCAL GEMS ***
>
> rspec (1.3.0)
> rspec-rails (1.3.2)
> sarah:~$ ruby -v
> ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [univ
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:31 PM, Sai Babu wrote:
> Hi friends
>
> in my rspec_controller
>
> 1...@user.articles.should_receive(:find_by_id).with('1').and_return(@article)
>
> get :show,:id => 1
>
> in above example 1 if i mention get :show, :id => 1 below the
> schould_receive
> it is working fin
17 matches
Mail list logo