Using the 'new' way of defining custom matchers explained here:
https://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wiki/Custom-Matchers
I'm having trouble figuring out how to write a custom matcher that
yields an object to a block where more matchers can be called on it.
For instance, I'd like my actual spe
Hey all,
I would like to be able to be able to have mocks where I can make all
the calls and assert that it was called afterwards. This would be
especially useful when asserting on a doing-method whose return value is
not being considered.
e.g.
service = mock(ExternalService)
ExternalS
On Mar 15, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Using the 'new' way of defining custom matchers explained here:
> https://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wiki/Custom-Matchers
>
> I'm having trouble figuring out how to write a custom matcher that yields an
> object to a block where more mat
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Srushti Ambekallu wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I would like to be able to be able to have mocks where I can make all the
> calls and assert that it was called afterwards. This would be especially
> useful when asserting on a doing-method whose return value is not being
>
Hi,
I just ran into kind of an issue with child models in a one-to-one
relationship who are also in a polymorphic association, i.e., their
foreign key is kept by another model, e.g., 'Comment'.
So, the path for a child might be "human_parents/1/child", while the
path to the polymorphic associatio
On 19 Mar 2011, at 13:35, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Srushti Ambekallu wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I would like to be able to be able to have mocks where I can make all the
>> calls and assert that it was called afterwards. This would be especially
>> useful when as
Thanks Ken, but when I said I was new to RSpec I didn't mean I was THAT new!
;o)
I think people aren't grasping the DataMapper chaining that is at the root
of my testing confusion. I managed to come up with a solution that I've
outlined here http://pastie.org/1690040
Basically, I mocked out a cou
On 19 Mar 2011, at 17:49, Sid Wood wrote:
> Thanks Ken, but when I said I was new to RSpec I didn't mean I was THAT new!
> ;o)
>
> I think people aren't grasping the DataMapper chaining that is at the root of
> my testing confusion. I managed to come up with a solution that I've outlined
> he
An update: This is now achieved with:
require 'rspec/mocks/standalone'
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
