Re: [rspec-users] Bundler and Setting up RSpec

2011-04-03 Thread David Chelimsky
On Mar 28, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Stuart Corbishley wrote: > Hi there, > > Does RSpec acknowledge bundler, and use the groups? RSpec doesn't really know anything about Bundler's internals, but the rake task does look for a Gemfile and shells out to 'bundler exec rspec' if it sees one unless you con

Re: [rspec-users] Error running rspec on Debian

2011-04-03 Thread David Chelimsky
On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:04 PM, Carlos Torres wrote: > I'm new to Rails and I was planning on trying out RSpec. When I try to > execute the rspec command on Debian v6.0.1, I get the output below: > > k4ru050@DebianBox:~/Desktop/rails_projects/sample_app/spec$ bundle exec rspec > spec/controllers

[rspec-users] Ruby 1.9.2 confusion

2011-04-03 Thread Phillip Koebbe
I'm wondering if someone could shed a little light on something for me. I'm trying to get a Rails 2.3.11 project running on Ruby 1.9.2-p180, and the same specs that pass on 1.8.7-p302 don't pass on 1.9.2-p180 if I run them one way, but do if I run them another way. If I run a particular view s

[rspec-users] fields_for view spec

2011-04-03 Thread Matt S.
For some reason I can't figure out how to make the fields_for tags render in the trivial example below; however, it works in the browser. What does #build_association do that my stubbed method does not replicate? (Or is that even the issue?) I appreciate the insight. Thanks! Matt Smith #spec/view

Re: [rspec-users] Ruby 1.9.2 confusion

2011-04-03 Thread Phillip Koebbe
On 2011-04-03 2:45 PM, Phillip Koebbe wrote: I'm wondering if someone could shed a little light on something for me. I'm trying to get a Rails 2.3.11 project running on Ruby 1.9.2-p180, and the same specs that pass on 1.8.7-p302 don't pass on 1.9.2-p180 if I run them one way, but do if I run