I had, for historic reasons, a setup on a group of specs:
before(:all) do
@contents = [%w(this that), %w(this other)]
FasterCSV.stub!(:open).and_return(@contents)
@filename = 'test_filename'
end
When I ran the single file (spec spec/transformer/csv_spec.rb), all my
specs passed.
I ran into something really puzzling today. I don't know exactly why
it's happening, but I thought I'd share my experiences.
I started a dummy app just to test an idea outside of the context of
my real work today. So, I quickly get things started:
* rails junk
* cd junk
* ruby script/plugin
What I've done with this is to just uninstall the gem and commit to
working off of the plugins completely. I've found that with gems in
general, I try to keep them local to the project I'm on, almost as if
they were a plugin. I move them to my project's lib (gem unpack) so
that I've got e
On Sep 7, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> El 7/9/2007, a las 5:36, Jay Levitt escribió:
>
>>> There's a very useful guideline in TDD that says "test YOUR code,
>>> not
>>> everyone elses." The validation library we're testing here is
>>> ActiveRecord's. It's already tested (we hope!
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
On Oct 5, 2007, at 7:26 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 10/5/07, Cody P. Skidmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just found this one: http://tinyurl.com/3c3mfa
>>
>> David, are there any other RSpec books in the works?
>
> Yes!
>
> Alsak and I are writing Behav
I was disgruntled with the amount of spam I was getting, so I started
setting up accounts for the various mailing lists I listen to. I use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to read the mail here. Along with the rspec
news that comes over this channel, I'm getting more and more spam
addressed to this same
