[rspec-users] Failure Messages in RSpec

know /why/. I don't see an easy way to include these sorts of messages in RSpec, which seems likely to cause me to waste time on test failures. Am I missing something? How are experienced RSpec users resolving this? Thanks, - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman

[rspec-users] Failure Messages in RSpec

a validation rule changed and the validation failed), which aren't as easy to message. Still, i'm willing to give this approach a shot and see if this bothers me increasingly less. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users

[rspec-users] False Positives and Autotest on New Folders

rails_rspec.rb in lib/autotest. We were considering separating our acceptance tests from the rest. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Preconditions

for setup; the syntax would look a little weird what with it_should_behave_like, but it's still a thought. -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Caveman Questions

:in `alias_method' from /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4 from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Going beyond the default html formatter/report?

of the spec, sometimes; when we're doing walkthroughs with the customer representative, it's useful for him to be able to see the source as well as the descriptions. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org

Re: [rspec-users] Philosophical questions

a written tutorial or screencast that walks this whole gamut in order if someone ever has time to do one. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Problems with testing nested routes using mocking

into the effort of creating a patch, but at the moment, I don't even know why my route generation's failing. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Using Predicates to look at an array..

live with the current approach as well, looks odd, but it's not a serious problem for me. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

[rspec-users] RSpec Trunk - Successful : Rake Aborted

I go a-digging? -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Rails, rSpec edge problems

in a module using include myself, got the same message above, but for a different method. Not sure if 'include' was having the desired effect for me (although I found another path by doing the include in helper.rb instead of inside the Scenario, which solved the problem for me. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey

Re: [rspec-users] have_xml_tag

and with_tag seem to work fine on XML for me, so ... if upgrading is an option, might be worth a shot. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] Lighthouse and Engine Yard sponsorships

so much what you use. It's far more important for the committers to pick the tool that works for them.) - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users