On Nov 11, 2007 8:39 PM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter
> produces gibberish:
> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html
>
> Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can't imagine
> anyo
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:49 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> I'm not talking about --format specdoc (which the spec:doc task uses),
> but --format rdoc, which is supposed to create RDoc - a file you can
> include in your RDocs. Since it's not producing what RDoc needs, I'd
> like to retire it.
I didn'
On Nov 12, 2007 12:45 AM, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does this mean that:
>
> rake spec:doc
>
> will not produce plain text specdocs?
>
No, spec:doc will remain untouched.
I'm not talking about --format specdoc (which the spec:doc task uses),
but --format rdoc, which is supposed to creat
does this mean that:
rake spec:doc
will not produce plain text specdocs?
On Nov 11, 2007, at 3:39 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> I'm doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter
> produces gibberish:
> http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html
>
> Will anyone pro
I'm doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter
produces gibberish:
http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html
Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can't imagine
anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter)
Aslak
__
