-1*
I upgraded a Rails project from rspec 0.9 to 1.1.2 -- and this change caused
me some pain. Luckily, I figured it out and confirmed it here on the list
before things got too bad. :)
* That said, I have to admit that I'm not super-pleased about my helper
methods that start with should_ -- they
On Nov 18, 2007 4:59 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As an experiment in playing nice with others, we've added the ability
in rspec's trunk to do this:
class ThingExamples Spec::ExampleGroup
def should_do_stuff
...
end
end
This is how rspec 0.1 worked,
+1 for keeping should prefix given the number of people who write helper
methods starting with should (at last count, one person) versus the number
of people who find it useful starting test methods with the word should in
xunit testing frameworks (nearly everyone I know). Obviously my world is
0
Should be able to turn on or off. don't know if the first went through.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2894
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2894
rails edge revision 8146
On Nov 18, 2007, at 9:59 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Hi all,
As an experiment in playing nice with
On Nov 18, 2007 10:29 AM, aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 4:59 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As an experiment in playing nice with others, we've added the ability
in rspec's trunk to do this:
class ThingExamples Spec::ExampleGroup
On 19/11/2007, at 5:05 AM, Nathan Sutton wrote:
0
Keep it, but make it a configuration option with default-off.
Nathan Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rspec edge revision 2894
rspec_on_rails edge revision 2894
rails edge revision 8146
I agree. +1 configuration with default being current
-1
I, as a new rspec user, did not find the switch between test_ and it
blah do to be even a small challenge compared to other things I had
to convert and learn. I only feel like it would be one more thing to
keep up with that would cause problems. I can certainly see someone
writing a
