There was some discussion about rsync preserving atimes
back in August last year that made the point that
you have to choose between ctime and atime
and ctime is often more important.
But I have a situation where the behaviour of
the --backup and --checksum options
is causing rsync to read f
I previously wrote:
> Well, as with any dynamic system, I'm not sure there's a totally
> simple answer to the overall allocation, as the tree structure created
Oops, this slipped through editing - as I wrote up the rest of the note
I didn't actually find a tree structure (I earlier thought there
Dave Dykstra [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> No, that behavior should be identical with the --include-from/exclude '*'
> approach; I don't believe rsync uses any memory for excluded files.
Actually, I think there's an exclude_struct allocated somewhere per
file (looks like 28 bytes or so), but the
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:42:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 25.01.2001 17:59:53 Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:21:14PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > When i try to sync the content of two directories i receive several
> > > different errors
Lenny Foner [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> While we're discussing memory issues, could someone provide a simple
> answer to the following three questions?
Well, as with any dynamic system, I'm not sure there's a totally
simple answer to the overall allocation, as the tree structure created
on the
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:47:32AM -0500, Lenny Foner wrote:
> While we're discussing memory issues, could someone provide a simple
> answer to the following three questions?
> (a) How much memory, in bytes/file, does rsync allocate?
Andrew Tridgell said 10-14 bytes per file in
http://lists.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harry Putnam writes:
> Sorry to reprint this request for information but I guess I want more
> handholding here.
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > "Michael H. Warfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > rsync ftp.wtfo.com::
> >
>
> Getting this far ... works as adver
On 25.01.2001 17:59:53 Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:21:14PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Hi!
> > When i try to sync the content of two directories i receive several
> > different errors on recurrent attempts:
> >
> > rsync -al -e ssh --delete -v . user@x:/home/ww
Remko Scharroo wrote:
First of all, I love rsync. After using mirror and
rdist, rsync really
does it well and fast!
I second this, this is a gem that should be in every sysadmin's
toolbox, what it has allowed me to accomplish here is nothing
short of remarkable!
But there is one feature I miss
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 02:24:37PM -0600, Denmark B. Weatherburn wrote:
> Hi Listers,
>
> I hope this posting qualifies for your acceptance.
> I'm working on a Korn shell script to using rsync to synchronize several Sun
> hosts running Solaris 2.7.
> Below is the error message that I get. I'm not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >
> > Anyone here know if redhat linux updates can be rsynced?
> >
> > If so, is it necessary to have rsh installed.
> >
> > I guess what I really need is to see the commands necessary to connect
> > to a redhat `updates' ftp site with rsync. If it is even pos
Sorry to reprint this request for information but I guess I want more
handholding here.
[...]
>
> "Michael H. Warfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > rsync ftp.wtfo.com::
>
Getting this far ... works as advertised.
But beyond that point, how to actually get to the files and collect t
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 08:30:50AM -0800, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> Hello, I am seeing the following problems when trying
> to perform rsync between a Sun running Solaris 8 and a
> Redhat Linux box. rsh is already set up to allow
> remote logins, file copies, etc.
>
>
> [cable@galadriel]{1348}% r
While we're discussing memory issues, could someone provide a simple
answer to the following three questions?
(a) How much memory, in bytes/file, does rsync allocate?
(b) Is this the same for the rsyncs on both ends, or is there
some asymmetry there?
(c) Does it matter whether pushing or pulli
Dave> Try using "-W" to disable the rsync rolling checksum algorithm
Dave> when copying between two NFS mounts, because that causes extra
Dave> NFS traffic. Rsync's algorithm is optimized for minimizing
Dave> network traffic between its two halves at the expense of extra
Dave> local access and i
Martin> Outstanding! Thank you very much, Dave.
Martin> I'll discuss the upgrade with my boss tomorrow and give it a
Martin> try then. Getting back to you guys afterwards to tell you how
Martin> it went.
I suspect that you'll still run into this problem with waitid() no
matter what, since it s
I have a setup that is showing very predictable rsync hangs.
SETUP
-
System: Linux 2.4.0+, rsync 2.4.6, 1Ghz T-bird (No OC), 256M, 45G IDE, 10G
IDE
Rsyncing an old 3.6G vfat partition from the 10G disk to the 45G disk. The
sync runs great until after it finishes a certain file. Same file ev
> Ah, rsync 2.4.1 had definite known problems with SSH
> transport. Upgrade
> to 2.4.6 and your problem should be solved. It's very easy to compile
> from source. Get it from rsync.samba.org and run configure and make.
> You can also use the solaris binary that I maintain on that web site;
> I
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:35:11PM +0100, Schmitt, Martin wrote:
> Dave,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> > No, it's not an out of memory problem but it is like one of
> > the numerous
> > different kinds of hangs that people experience. Are you
> > copying between
> > two places on the same sy
Dave,
thanks for your reply.
> No, it's not an out of memory problem but it is like one of
> the numerous
> different kinds of hangs that people experience. Are you
> copying between
> two places on the same system or are you copying to another
> system? What
> kinds of network transport is
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:08:56PM +0100, Remko Scharroo wrote:
> First of all, I love rsync. After using mirror and rdist, rsync really
> does it well and fast!
>
> But there is one feature I miss in rsync that rdist has: there seems to
> be no way to exclude binary executables from being copied
John,
thanks for your reply.
> Welcome to the club! Is this filesystem local or NFS mounted? And
> how are you sending the data to another filesystem? Also, which
> version of rsync are you using?
I don't know if this is the correct wording, since I'm a clueless Solaris
newbie, but judging
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:21:27AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
>
> Martin> I'm dealing with a big and ugly filesystem that looks like this:
>
> Martin> $ du -sk .
> Martin> 1526500 .
> Martin> $ find . -depth -print | wc -l
> Martin> 152221
>
> Welcome to the club! Is this filesystem local or
First of all, I love rsync. After using mirror and rdist, rsync really
does it well and fast!
But there is one feature I miss in rsync that rdist has: there seems to
be no way to exclude binary executables from being copied. Of course, if
you know the file names you can, but if you don't you can'
Martin> I'm dealing with a big and ugly filesystem that looks like this:
Martin> $ du -sk .
Martin> 1526500 .
Martin> $ find . -depth -print | wc -l
Martin> 152221
Welcome to the club! Is this filesystem local or NFS mounted? And
how are you sending the data to another filesystem? Also, w
Hello everyone!
I'm dealing with a big and ugly filesystem that looks like this:
$ du -sk .
1526500 .
$ find . -depth -print | wc -l
152221
rsync seems to run into some 20M limit on this Slowaris 2.6 machine. CPU
usage goes down to zero, 20M memory allocation, no activity from rsync.
This lo
26 matches
Mail list logo
