On 18 Jul 2002, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (definitely NOT rzync).
Great. (Excuse my overreaction :-)
> Re: rzync's variable-length fields: Note that my code allows more
> variation than just 2 or 4 bytes -- e.g., I size the 8-byte file-size
> value to only as many bytes as ne
On 16 Jul 2002, Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If by sillyrename, you mean busy text files are renamed to .nfs*,
"sillyrename" is in fact the technical term for this. I am not making
it up. I'm pretty sure Callaghan's book calls it that, Sun people call
it that, and it is the term
> "WD" == Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote the following on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
WD> Re: rzync's name cache. I've revamped it to be a very
WD> dependable design that no longer depends on lock-step
WD> synchronization in the expiration of old items (just in
On 18 Jul 2002, Paul Nendick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a commercial project that would benefit immensely from
> the use of rsync. However, I cannot convince management that rsync is a
> worthy tool due to the rote "it's shareware, it's not supported" FUD.
>
> Are there any do
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 06:46:52PM -0400, Stephane Paltani wrote:
> I can propose a billion-dollar NASA project called Chandra as a
> testimonial (OK, most of the money does not go into the archive!).
If you want simple examples of users, try a few names they might
recognize:
IBM (probably even
I was seeing rsync errors which caused my system installations to fail
repeatedly and absolutely. See the error I reported to this mailing
list back in June in the Forwarded Message below.
When I replaced my NIC cards (realtec chip, 8139too driver) with Linksys
cards (and Dec Tulip driver for li
Hello,
Paul Nendick wrote:
>
> I'm working on a commercial project that would benefit immensely from
> the use of rsync. However, I cannot convince management that rsync is a
> worthy tool due to the rote "it's shareware, it's not supported" FUD.
>
> Are there any documented, corportate users
jw schultz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Ask them about the last time they called customer support.
> Then point out the number of developers they have or can
> hire who could "fix" rsync using the source code IF it ever
> "breaks".
I've tried logic and reason. Both were defeated by their COBOL /
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:19:40AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've put a cleaned-up version of my design notes up here
> > http://samba.org/~mbp/superlifter/design-notes.html
>
> I'll start with some feedback on your rzync comments:
>
> Re: rzync
I'm working on a commercial project that would benefit immensely from
the use of rsync. However, I cannot convince management that rsync is a
worthy tool due to the rote "it's shareware, it's not supported" FUD.
Are there any documented, corportate users of rsync? Testimonials? In
short, how
Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've put a cleaned-up version of my design notes up here
> http://samba.org/~mbp/superlifter/design-notes.html
I'll start with some feedback on your rzync comments:
Re: rzync's name: I currently consider the rZync to be a test app to
allow me (and an
11 matches
Mail list logo
