Re: state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)

2003-06-09 Thread Martin Pool
On 8 Jun 2003, Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The "next big thing" in delta calculation is probably going to be the > vcdiff encoding format, which should allow a common delta format for > various applications and supports "self-referencing delta's", which > makes it capable of compr

Re: state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)

2003-06-09 Thread Martin Pool
On 9 Jun 2003, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:43 pm, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > The comments about rsync never using libhsync/librsync are still true > > for the foreseeable future. There are many things rsync includes that > > are still missing from l

Re: need assistance with rsync keeping two live servers synced.

2003-06-09 Thread Justin Kreger
I looked at a distributed file system, and I need the ability to set file system level permissions that can be modified by samba. Yippie evil windows users wanting access.. ugh. On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 12:52, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:12:56AM -0400, Justin Kreger wrote: > >

Re: Red Hat rsync - 'sign' patch

2003-06-09 Thread jw schultz
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:56:34PM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote: > I recently became the new rsync maintainer for Red Hat, > and I just completed a review of the current patches that > we (Red Hat) maintain for 'rsync'. After removing three > unnecessary patches (either already incorporated into > r

Red Hat rsync - 'sign' patch

2003-06-09 Thread Hardy Merrill
I recently became the new rsync maintainer for Red Hat, and I just completed a review of the current patches that we (Red Hat) maintain for 'rsync'. After removing three unnecessary patches (either already incorporated into rsync-2.5.6, or were outdated and couldn't be applied), we are left with o

Re: need assistance with rsync keeping two live servers synced.

2003-06-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:12:56AM -0400, Justin Kreger wrote: > I have a project that requires that I have two file servers physically > separated, both of which need to be able to written to and synced using > rsync. Besides jw's suggestion of unison (which is the right tool for the job, not rsy

Re: state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)

2003-06-09 Thread Brad Hards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:43 pm, Donovan Baarda wrote: > The comments about rsync never using libhsync/librsync are still true > for the foreseeable future. There are many things rsync includes that > are still missing from librsync, and the rsync implemen