Hi,
I'm having a problem rsyncing one file (since I signed it). It seems that
the content of a file is able to cause problems in the protocol.
building file list ...
28820 files to consider
apt/packages/avifile/
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Dag Wieers wrote:
I'm having a problem rsyncing one file (since I signed it). It seems that
the content of a file is able to cause problems in the protocol.
building file list ...
28820 files to consider
apt/packages/avifile/
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:05:09 -0700 jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rsync is not an efficient local copy utility. It can be
used for local copying but local and high-bandwidth network
speed is sacrificed for low-bandwidth performance and for
data integrity.
I've been surprised at how fast
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 07:46:05PM -0700, Ben Escoto wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:05:09 -0700 jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rsync is not an efficient local copy utility. It can be
used for local copying but local and high-bandwidth network
speed is sacrificed for low-bandwidth
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 20:28:21 -0700 jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The referenced mail message describes the benchmark as:
| The directory backed up or restored had 1 1-byte files
That isn't a very good benchmark. 10,000 files is not that
many and being 1 byte means that all that is
