I've setup SSH for auto login. It seems I can just do
rsync -e ssh -aupg 10.10.10.24:/home/MYDOMAIN /home fine
Do I still need /etc/rsyncd.conf on the server?
Nope. I do the same thing, and I've never needed it.
As far as I know you should only have the rsync binary installed.
When you
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:32:37AM +, a a wrote:
I know there is a read only option that can be specified in
rsyncd.conf - is there any way to make it upload only?
You can exclude everything from the download, like this:
exclude = *
That would prevent rsync of allowing any file to be
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:57:21PM -0500, Joe Harrington wrote:
The -vn option lists all files to be copied or deleted, including
symlinks, but it does not appear to list empty directories to be
copied, even tough it copies them.
Unfortunately, this is a known bug that we haven't taken the
Hello,
I have a RedHat 7.3 on which I deinstall the openssl-0.9.6b-35.7 and the
openssl-devel-0.9.6b-35.7 packages and compiledinstall openssl-0.9.7c-1.
After I downloaded, compiled install rsync-2.6.0 successfully exept that
when I try to use I get the error:
OpenSSL version mismatch. Built
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:23:56PM -0500, Vlady wrote:
OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 90602f, you have 90703f
Rsync doesn't do anything directly with ssl, it runs the ssh program (by
default in 2.6.0). You should ensure that you can ssh successfully into
the system you want to rsync
I'm considering using rsync in our data center but I'm worried about whether
it will scale to the numbers and sizes we deal with. We would be moving up
to a terabyte in a typical sync, consisting of about a million files. Our
data mover machines are RedHat Linux Advanced Server 2.1 and all the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:55:42PM -0800, Bret Foreman wrote:
I'm considering using rsync in our data center but I'm worried about whether
it will scale to the numbers and sizes we deal with. We would be moving up
to a terabyte in a typical sync, consisting of about a million files. Our
data
It is my belief that there is not a compatibility problem with the
return value of snprintf() like there is with sprintf() (i.e. on some
systems, like SunOS, sprintf() returns a char* instead of an int, but
I don't believe that such systems even have snprintf()).
Does anyone know of a system
Yes, it's time once again to return to the subject of moving files.
With the recent changes to the communications code between the receiver
and the generator, there is now a non-clogging channel that we can use
to signal the sender when a file has been successfully transferred,
which allows us
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:30:57PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
Yes, it's time once again to return to the subject of moving files.
With the recent changes to the communications code between the receiver
and the generator, there is now a non-clogging channel that we can use
to signal the sender
Date: Sat Jan 17 01:16:49 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/home/wayned/src/rsync
Modified Files:
flist.c
Log Message:
Items read from a per-directory .cvsignore file should be added to the
local_exclude_list, not the exclude_list.
Revisions:
Date: Sat Jan 17 01:23:41 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18002
Modified Files:
NEWS
Log Message:
A --cvs-ignore fix.
Revisions:
NEWS1.144 = 1.145
Date: Sat Jan 17 04:58:24 2004
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/home/wayned/src/rsync
Modified Files:
main.c
Log Message:
Unified the externs.
Revisions:
main.c 1.179 = 1.180
13 matches
Mail list logo
