suppressing motd without decreasing verbosity

2004-03-12 Thread Akop Pogosian
Is there a way to make the rsync client suppress the motd without suppressing other messages when connecting to an rsync server? What I want is to run rsync from cron and have it produce output only when any files have been downloaded or deleted and whenever errors have happened. Otherwise, I want

Re: rsync wont work

2004-03-12 Thread alexus
i'm sorry i didn't get your email, or i somehow missed it.. sorry about that d# rsync -vvvcrlpogtz /tmp/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp opening connection using ssh -l root domain.ltd rsync --server -vvvlogtprcz . /tmp [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so fa

Re: rsync wont work

2004-03-12 Thread Tim Conway
As you may recall from the last time I answered you, please send the same thing, but use 3 "v"s instead of only one. rsync -vvvcrlpogtz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/rsync/ Since you don't know which transport you are using, we can read the output from the above command to find out. You are not getting to

Two bugs in rsync (--dry-run and --delete-excluded)

2004-03-12 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi rsync gurus! [Please Cc: me, as I am NOT subscribed to the list!] First the data points: debian/woody, local server=i386 arch, remote is alpha arch rsync version on both debian 2.5.5-0.2 While upgrading our server to a raid we were hit by a bug which I really consider very strange: The optio

rsync wont work

2004-03-12 Thread alexus
can someone tell me what am i doing wrong? d# rsync -vcrlpogtz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/rsync/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: sh: rsync: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(189) d# it works fine if i just specif

Re: some clarity Re: HFS+ resource forks: WIP patch included

2004-03-12 Thread D Andrew Reynhout
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:08:52PM -0500, D Andrew Reynhout wrote: > If you convert the file to a single stream (AppleSingle), you > have to change the filename on the destination, else you run the Another problem with file conversion in-stream is what to do with the converted file on the source s

Re: some clarity Re: HFS+ resource forks: WIP patch included

2004-03-12 Thread D Andrew Reynhout
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:04:36PM -0500, Wesley D Craig wrote: > My preference is to not adjust the protocol, at least not for HFS+ > support. I don't think it's necessary or particularly desirable. In > particular, I don't see much value in making rsync changes that destroy > my ability to s

Re: some clarity Re: HFS+ resource forks: WIP patch included

2004-03-12 Thread Wesley D Craig
On 12 Mar 2004, at 11:17, D Andrew Reynhout wrote: I think the maintainers have to err on the side of caution regarding changes to the application, and especially to the protocol. My preference is to not adjust the protocol, at least not for HFS+ support. I don't think it's necessary or particula

Re: some clarity Re: HFS+ resource forks: WIP patch included

2004-03-12 Thread D Andrew Reynhout
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:41:03AM -0500, Wesley D Craig wrote: > I'd be happy to work on this myself, since I already have very similar > code, if there was some possibility that the rsync maintainers would be > willing to accept the modifications. Otherwise, it seems like a waste > of effort.

Re: some clarity Re: HFS+ resource forks: WIP patch included

2004-03-12 Thread Wesley D Craig
On 10 Mar 2004, at 13:57, Kevin Alexander Boyd wrote: For --eahfs, what needs to be implemented is catching extra data on non-HFS+ filesystems, say storing them in a standard Apple alien FS format. If you change the file (encode split, etc), you are altering the source folders, which is not desira

Re: some clarity Re: HFS+ resource forks: WIP patch included

2004-03-12 Thread Wesley D Craig
On 10 Mar 2004, at 15:07, Kevin Alexander Boyd wrote: Every HFS+ file has finder metadata, and it must be stored somewhere in order for the files to be correctly synced and/or restored. Every HFS+ file may have Finder info. Most do not. That doesn't really help, tho, since some do all must be ch

RE: Help I've lost all my resource forks

2004-03-12 Thread Jason Ferguson
It's ok I needed the --eahfs switch, please disregard my last email. -Original Message- From: Jason Ferguson Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 1:26 PM To: Kevin Alexander Boyd Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help I've lost all my resource forks Hi, Can you help me since upgrading the late

Help I've lost all my resource forks

2004-03-12 Thread Jason Ferguson
Hi, Can you help me since upgrading the latest version of rsync on my Xservers I have lost all resouce fork information and I am losing the file types on the backup server. The command I am using is sudo rsync -e ssh -avz /Times_QPS/ 192.168.22.72:/Times_QPS/ Am I missing something simple?

Re: HFS+ resource forks: WIP patch included

2004-03-12 Thread John Van Essen
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 01:11:35PM -0500, D Andrew Reynhout wrote: >> but I'm less clear on >> why (it appears) that *both* sides sort the flist. > > This is because the flist gets sent as it is created, so it is sent > unsorted. Wit