On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, 68Caliber.Com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have no idea what email address it is
> sending the messages to, nor do I know what the password is to get in to
> change it.
To determine the email address by which you get rsync list emails,
view the header of a message that
Please remove me from this list. I have no idea what email address it is
sending the messages to, nor do I know what the password is to get in to
change it.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/sma
I've been using the --keep-dirlinks feature of 2.6.3pre1. I also
use -x (--one-file-system) and --delete-after.
The symlinked directories on the receiver are symlinked to a
partition other than the one where the target of the rsync resides
(that's the whole point of this nifty --keep-dirlinks fea
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:02:23PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Is there any way of increasing rsync's block transfer size for when you
> need to transfer data from one filesystem to another on the same disk?
Since a local transfer is using --whole-file mode, it should be possible
to just set the
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:56:06AM -0400, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> I'd like to extend rsync's --log-format to be more detailed
> and ultimately work in --dry-run mode.
Something like this would indeed be nice, and it was something that J.W.
was going to work on were he still with us. You might wa
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:27:55AM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > Later, there are two separate threads anyways.
>
> They are separate processes that don't share memory, and sharing memory
> would be required to compare the two files lists af
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:26:06PM -0400, Mirko wrote:
> /cygdrive/d/home/Program\ Files/
> /cygdrive/d/home/System\ Volume\ Information/
Backslashes have no special meaning in an exclude file, so just drop
those characters and try again (filenames are one per line, so the
spaces are assumed to be
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1646
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:27:55AM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Later, there are two separate threads anyways.
They are separate processes that don't share memory, and sharing memory
would be required to compare the two files lists after they were
generated.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:48:31PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > So, my question (indeed more, a wish): wouldn't it be possible to start
> > bulding both databases in parallel, or shortly after each other?
>
> That would be possible, yes, bu
Hi,
I'm using rsync 2.6.2 (and cygwin 1.5.10) for backups of my folders on
my PC. rsync cannot open two system subdirectories in my home
directory: "Program Files" and "System Volume Information". I tried
including them in the exclude-file, to no avail.
I suspect the problem may be the spaces in
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:48:31PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> So, my question (indeed more, a wish): wouldn't it be possible to start
> bulding both databases in parallel, or shortly after each other?
That would be possible, yes, but it might be tricky to get it efficient
(since you would
Nope, I cannot telnet port 873. I tried "telnet C-computer" and "telnet
C-computer 873" but command give the error:
Connection refused.
On the other hand, the SSH command from B-computer to C-computer works
does give connection without any problems.
Thanx in advance,
Stef
Andrzej Filip wrot
Stefaan Lhermitte wrote:
I'm trying to rsync my labtop pc (let's assume A-computer) with my
desktop pc (let's assume C-computer) through our firewall.
In between there is one computer (let's assume B-computer) that has an
open port, so I theoretically could connect via a tunnel.
I checked the SSH
Dear RSYNCians,
I'm trying to rsync my labtop pc (let's assume A-computer) with my
desktop pc (let's assume C-computer) through our firewall.
In between there is one computer (let's assume B-computer) that has an
open port, so I theoretically could connect via a tunnel.
I checked the SSH- website
Is there any way of increasing rsync's block transfer size for when you
need to transfer data from one filesystem to another on the same disk?
Using a large blocksize tends to decrease track to track seeks. If I
put a large dd or something in between two tar's in such a situation, I
see over dou
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 13:59 ---
Thanks for your reply. I've narrowed it down to being caused by -o. Here are the
steps I performed, exactly as they were done, so you can check my diagnosis.
I've used a
Hi (especially Wayne),
ftp.gwdg.de is rsyncing most of the data from about 500 other rsync
servers.
Especially during the general "high traffic" phases like the release of
a new Knoppix ISO or a new SUSE distribution or a new KDE release, I see
timeouts with other servers which have maximum tra
Wayne Davison wrote:
>>Using "--delete-after" does not work with
>>2.6.3pre1 (sender, Fedora Core 2) and
>>2.5.7 (receiver, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3):
>
>
> I've run this combination of rsync versions without any problems (though
> my copy went from Debian to RH 9). It would help if you could
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:54:07PM -0400, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> i do see the funky read/write logic in report(), but this only seems
> to be used for the two line stats summary
I guess I was assuming that we'd only want this statistic from the
sender, but that may not be a true assumption. So,
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
On Sep 07, Wayne Davison wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:34:09AM -0400, Christophe Kalt wrote:
| > The attached diff causes rsync to show how much time it spends
| > on building and sending its filelist.
|
| Your patch doesn't take into account that the statistics are sometimes
| sent at the e
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> rsync -av -e ssh --delete --link-dest=$link_dest --compare-dest=$link_dest $src
> $dest
There's only one compare-dest/link-dest value in rsync, so this adding
of --compare-dest has no effect.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or cha
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 08:30:24PM +0200, Marten Lehmann wrote:
> I thought that link-dest is the right thing for this, so that each
> file from /vrmd/webserver is either hardlinked to the already backuped
> file in 2004-09-05 or it will be copied to 2004-09-06.
Yes, you thought correctly.
> Is -
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:05:08PM +0200, Essyug wrote:
> My test directory on W2k and all its content are owned by
> DOMAIN\testuser, which is a domain administrator.
Rsync only tries to change file ownership if it thinks that it is
running as root, and that test is currently a simple comparison
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:29:30PM -0400, Tim Conway wrote:
> move your uid and gid into the module. They are not valid as global
> options.
Setting the uid and gid in the global context sets the default values
for all of the modules.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:18:43AM -0400, neo wrote:
> However, I can't find these same options as mine in the example script
> files.
FYI, the rsyncd.conf manpage lists all the available options.
> So what is the proper way to set the uid and gid options?
The options as you listed them were fin
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:34:09AM -0400, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> The attached diff causes rsync to show how much time it spends
> on building and sending its filelist.
Your patch doesn't take into account that the statistics are sometimes
sent at the end of the transfer if the sender is not the
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:06:30AM +0200, Stefan Hoelldampf wrote:
> Using "--delete-after" does not work with
> 2.6.3pre1 (sender, Fedora Core 2) and
> 2.5.7 (receiver, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3):
I've run this combination of rsync versions without any problems (though
my copy went from Debian t
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 04:31:36PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> - { RERR_VANISHED , "some files vanished before they could be transfered" },
> + { RERR_VANISHED , "some files vanished before they could be transferred" },
Thanks! This fix has been committed.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscr
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:58:33AM +0100, SPJ.Schembri wrote:
> rsync -av --progress --partial-dir=./tmp --bwlimit=100 /tcwork/bigfile.tar [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]::root
I finally had some time to work on rsync again (I've been rather
busy lately), so I investigated the partial-dir problem.
The code
On Tue 07 Sep 2004, Marten Lehmann wrote:
>
> >Try this:
> >rsync -av -e ssh --delete --link-dest=$link_dest
> >--compare-dest=$link_dest $src $dest
> >
> >i.e. add the --compare-dest option...
>
> --compare-dest and --link-dest aren't thought to be used together:
>
> --link-dest compar
Hello,
You're trying to make a sort of snapshot per day, where common files
across days are hardlinked?
yes.
Try this:
rsync -av -e ssh --delete --link-dest=$link_dest --compare-dest=$link_dest $src
$dest
i.e. add the --compare-dest option...
--compare-dest and --link-dest aren't thought to be
On Mon 06 Sep 2004, Marten Lehmann wrote:
>
> src="/vrmd/webserver/"
> today=`date +%F`
> #link_dest="[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/vrmd/admin/backup/web/2004-09-05"
> link_dest="../2004-09-05"
> dest="[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/vrmd/admin/backup/web/$today"
> rsync -av -e ssh --delete --link-dest=$link_dest $src $d
34 matches
Mail list logo
