Re: ACL and RSYNC and -a

2005-08-12 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 11 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a' switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes? I thought that -a means everything - so when everything grows -a should grow with it. -a does not mean everything... e.g.

RSYNC File Has Vanished

2005-08-12 Thread Ryan Kather
Greetings, I am attempting to RSYNC files from a Linux box which has a mounted path to a NetWare 6.5 server. I am using the Novell Client for Linux (beta). I am sure this is probably a Novell issue, and there won't be much help on this mailing list, but perhaps someone could explain what the

Re: ACL and RSYNC and -a

2005-08-12 Thread Marc Perkel
Paul Slootman wrote: On Thu 11 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a' switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes? I thought that -a means everything - so when everything grows -a should grow with it.

Re: ACL and RSYNC and -a

2005-08-12 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu 11 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a' switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes? Given a better implementation of the --acls option (i.e. one that doesn't complain if a source disk doesn't support ACLs), that

Re: ACL and RSYNC and -a

2005-08-12 Thread Marc Perkel
Wayne Davison wrote: Given a better implementation of the --acls option (i.e. one that doesn't complain if a source disk doesn't support ACLs), that might make sense. Another thing to keep in mind, though, is that rsync always passes the individual options to the remote rsync, so adding