hello matt,
thank you for your reply.
as is see, the method you describe is just theoretical, because it won`t work
due to buffering issue.
furthermore, it still needs ssh or maybe another remote shell.
i'd like to leave out ssh or probably any remote shell entirely because
encryption is
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:35:11PM +1100, Craig Hammond wrote:
I have a particular directory in my exclude list, but I want it
excluded from --delete-excluded.
Sure, that's easy enough using filter rules. Just add a protect filter
rule to what you have now and rsync will protect any matching
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:10:30AM -0500, Dave Mielke wrote:
The itemized output now uses 'S' for a special file instead of
clumping them together with the 'D' for devices.
Is this a Windows thing?
Nope. On Posix systems, you need root privileges to create devices
(character or block) but
Hi,
Specs: rsync is running as root with prio: 0
Linux: Debian Kernel: 2.4.30
Rsync: rsync version 2.6.4 protocol version 29
We are having problems with a very high load at the time of an rsync is running.
Sometimes if 2 or 3 Rsyncs are running simultanously on to the same machine the load
On Thu 09 Feb 2006, yogesh kulkarni wrote:
Am presently working on rsync and would like to know
how does rsync identify hardlinks.I have gone through
the hlink.c file and have not really understood the
flow presented in the function.If anyone can provide
On Wed 08 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison wrote:
Rsync version 2.6.7pre1 is now available for release testing. Please
give it a try and send email to the regular mailing list with any
questions, comments, bug reports, etc.
A couple of text improvements / typos that were sent to me...
Paul Slootman
On Thu 09 Feb 2006, Matthias Blohm wrote:
We are having problems with a very high load at the time of an rsync is
running.
Sometimes if 2 or 3 Rsyncs are running simultanously on to the same machine
the load goes up on that machine to 10 or more. the datas will be synced in
about 2 or 3
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
-Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios that can
+Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios than can
I also note that the first this should be that.
-options that rsync might
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:04:17PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
compare inode and device number. When those are the same, the two files
must be hardlinked.
Also, rsync only considers files that have a link count larger than 1
(see stat()'s st_nlink) since this allows it to ignore the vast
Is the --ipv4, --ipv6 description twice in the manpage?
The description is quite different, so I'm wondering whether it should
be in a different context :-)
Paul Slootman
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read:
Wayne Davison wrote:
- (below) in order to have the rules that are read-in from the file
+ (below) in order to have the rules that are read in from the file
I consider the original a good use of hyphenation to help distinguish
the phrase are read-in from a file (using the past-tense of
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:04:17PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
compare inode and device number. When those are the same, the two files
must be hardlinked.
Also, rsync only considers files that have a link count larger than 1
(see stat()'s st_nlink) since this allows
[quoted lines by Jamie Lokier on 2006/02/09 at 18:55 +]
I think the hyphen is out of place; it looks very wrong to my eye, but
I'm not a grammarian so don't have a fine explanation.
You're quite right ... read in should be two separate words as there should
not be a hyphen between a verb and
Does rsync support acl and xattr (as with acl and user_xattr mount options)?
I saw some acl patches for rsync, so probably it's not officially
blessed yet.
However, I didn't see any xattr patches - although some talks about it
on the list go back into year 2003.
So how it is with support
I'm trying out rsync 2.6.7pre1. Since the distributed patches now patch
generated files, I thought I could simply extract, apply the ACL patch,
configure, and make. However, the ACL patch tried to patch
autom4te.cache files I didn't have because I didn't autoconf myself.
I'm guessing this is an
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
--- rsync-2.6.7pre1.orig/rsync.yo
+++ rsync-2.6.7pre1/rsync.yo
@@ -1014,7 +1018,7 @@
as it is sent to the destination machine, which reduces the amount of data
being transmitted -- something that is useful over a slow
Date: Thu Feb 9 10:25:25 2006
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3687
Modified Files:
NEWS
Log Message:
- Improved the description of how 'D' because 'D' and 'S' for -i.
- Improved the --devices and --specials item, and moved it next to
Date: Thu Feb 9 11:56:33 2006
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12715
Modified Files:
rsync.yo
Log Message:
The -h was missing from the daemon's option summary.
Revisions:
rsync.yo1.347 = 1.348
Date: Thu Feb 9 11:56:41 2006
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12887
Modified Files:
rsync.1
Log Message:
Regenerated.
Revisions:
rsync.1 1.359 = 1.360
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/rsync.1?r1=1.359r2=1.360
Date: Thu Feb 9 17:32:46 2006
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv641
Modified Files:
rsync.1
Log Message:
Regenerated.
Revisions:
rsync.1 1.360 = 1.361
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/rsync.1?r1=1.360r2=1.361
20 matches
Mail list logo
