On 2006-02-21 16:09, Martin Pool wrote:
> Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost?
Done:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1436299&group_id=56125&atid=479439
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1436301&group_id=56125&atid=4
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and
> librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision
> attacks are known on MD4.
Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost?
First of all, thanks for all the comments.
And sorry for taking so long to respond. I had to strategically "forget"
a short time about the illustration and in interim two months have passed.
My inner clock must be going wrong.
Anyway, here is a revised edition. I have decided to keep the origina
--On Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:48 PM +0100 Torbjörn Nordling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Problem:
I have two computers (one at work and one home) and I want to keep them
identical, but I cannot rsync them directly because when one is running
then the second is turned off. I also have access t
Problem:
I have two computers (one at work and one home) and I want to keep them
identical, but I cannot rsync them directly because when one is running
then the second is turned off. I also have access to 500 MB of storage
space on a server running continuously, which is not nearly enough to
