Deleted Data

2006-04-17 Thread Chuck Wolber
Greetings, When using the --delete argument, is there any way to get rsync to tell me how much data it deleted after a run? ..Chuck.. -- http://www.quantumlinux.com Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC. ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology The measure of the restoration lies in the

Re: Encryption

2006-04-17 Thread milutin
Hello, Take a look at Rsyncrypto, rsync friendly file encryption http://sourceforge.net/projects/rsyncrypto The file are encrypted befor it rsync. Regards, Milutin Voinivich http://www.nasbackup.com/ ** Julian Pace Ross wrote: Hi all, I recently came across a possible requirement of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3692] regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with --link-dest

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3692 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-17 02:41 MST --- try this... seems at least freebsd, possibly others: 1 - won't link(2) directories, which is documented in man 2 link and man 1 ln. 2 - won't link(2) symlinks which doesn't

Re: Encryption

2006-04-17 Thread Julian Pace Ross
Thanks everyone for your feedback. Seems to me that Alex explained the issue with this perfectly. However, having said that, it seems that rsyncrypto is a possible candidate to simplify this in an rsyncrypto+rsync setup. I downloaded it and spent a few minutes trying to make it work, but I didnt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3692] regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with --link-dest

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3692 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-17 11:06 MST --- Rsync's strange behavior is clearly the fault of BSD's link(2), which, as you implied, hardlinks symlink targets instead of the symlinks themselves. The solution is to add

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3693] New: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 Summary: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3692] regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with --link-dest

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3692 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-17 12:41 MST --- not sure of the wording 'hardlinks symlink targets'. a symlink target is not what a symlink '-' points '-' to. at least as the bsd man page defines it. linux calls it a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3693] rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-17 14:15 MST --- ... The source files src/f1 and src/f2 are both identical to the single link-dest file that has the names linkdest/f1 and linkdest/f2. the contents are the same but some

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3692] regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with --link-dest

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3692 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3693] rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-17 15:23 MST --- (In reply to comment #1) the contents are the same but some of the meta information is not. Oops: the mtimes were different. Now I'm not sure how I tickled the bug the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3692] regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with --link-dest

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3692 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-17 15:35 MST --- The new configure check for CAN_HARDLINK_SYMLINK should work, assuming that BSD's link(2) fails to follow the dangling symlink and fails with ENOENT. However, there might

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3693] rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links

2006-04-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-17 21:20 MST --- If DIR is a relative path, it is relative to the destination directory. apologies indeed, missed that in the man page. Please try my corrected script and see if the rest

CVS update: rsync

2006-04-17 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Mon Apr 17 18:00:10 2006 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20067 Modified Files: NEWS Log Message: Mention the latest fixes. Revisions: NEWS1.393 = 1.394

CVS update: rsync

2006-04-17 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Mon Apr 17 19:53:41 2006 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18552 Modified Files: generator.c Log Message: Fixed a bug where special files were not getting hard-linked via the --link-dest option. Revisions: generator.c

CVS update: rsync

2006-04-17 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Mon Apr 17 19:55:16 2006 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19100 Modified Files: NEWS Log Message: Mention the latest bugfix. Revisions: NEWS1.394 = 1.395

CVS update: rsync/patches

2006-04-17 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Tue Apr 18 04:45:30 2006 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync/patches In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12049 Modified Files: log-file.diff Log Message: A slight tweak to the logic that calls log_exit(). Revisions: log-file.diff 1.4 = 1.5

CVS update: rsync/patches

2006-04-17 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Tue Apr 18 04:45:44 2006 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync/patches In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12796 Modified Files: detect-renamed.diff Log Message: Fixed failing hunks. Revisions: detect-renamed.diff 1.3 = 1.4