I have made rsync 3.0.3pre1 available for release testing. This is
another bug-fix release, with the only "enhancements" being some
improved terminology in the rsyncd.conf manpage and some improvements
in the testsuite.
To see a summary of the changes since 3.0.2, visit this link:
http://rsync
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg21380.html
I ran into the same issue a few years ago, solved it, forgot the solution and
then rediscovered it this evening. I think my solution is actually a little
simpler and easier to follow than the arrays proposed by a couple of other
list
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-07 23:20 CST ---
Note that, as currently implemented, --no-tweak does not prevent tweaking of
non-directories when the destination is subject to malicious concurrent
modification: someone can
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |enhancement
Summary|rsync mo
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4793
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 06:25:36PM -0700, Carl E. Thompson wrote:
> This patch causes rsync to honor the absence of the "--inplace" option
> for permission, owner and group changes.
Unfortunately, that's not what the --inplace option is for. Its purpose
is to control how data updates occur, not a
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5449
Summary: Daemon link-dest directory
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.3
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
Hello,
Attached is a patch to version 3.0.2 to correct what I believe to be
a bug and serious problem in rsync. This patch causes rsync to honor the
absence of the "--inplace" option for permission, owner and group
changes. This patch is a greatly simplified version of Matt McCutchen's
excell
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-07 20:23 CST ---
Created an attachment (id=3280)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=3280&action=view)
A patch to correct this behavior
Attached is a patch to version 3.0.2 to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-07 20:19 CST ---
See bug #5448.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448
Summary: rsync modifies files in place even without --inplace
specified
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: maj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a secure way to back up a system as root, with rsync
> (assume we don't want to kill the bandwidth and want a "snapshot" system
> for developers in a way that makes dump, tar, etc impractical.
>
> We've got an ssh key relationship set up and we can
Again, in a nutshell: it's as though --whole-file is being specified.. though
i'm quite sure it's not implied in this case.
From: Julian Pace Ross
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 2:11 PM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: speedup remains 1
Hi List,
I'm observing a strange problem on 2.6.9 (
Hi List,
I'm observing a strange problem on 2.6.9 (no opportunity to upgrade on both
ends yet).
Receiver is linux, sender is cygwin.
I transferred a 6GB file (an MS SQL .bak file) physically from one site to the
other, in order to get the first "backup" done.
In the meantime, the sender gener
On Wed 07 May 2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>
> Is there a simple filter syntax or command switch that says "let them
> transfer anything down, but not up?" I didn't find anything in the man
> pages, and the filters didn't seem to be for this kind of thing.
Set up an rsync daemon, an
I'm using rsync 2.6.9 and rsnapshot 1.2.9 on Ubuntu 8.04. When using
rsnapshot to backup a remote computer over ssh, I get the message
rsync error: unexplained error (code 130) at rsync.c(271) [generator=2.6.9]
ERROR: /usr/bin/rsync returned 130 while processing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
I looked at th
Hello all,
I'm trying to set up a secure way to back up a system as root, with rsync
(assume we don't want to kill the bandwidth and want a "snapshot" system
for developers in a way that makes dump, tar, etc impractical.
We've got an ssh key relationship set up and we can force the command to
17 matches
Mail list logo