Either way - as a workaround, you could drop delete-excluded, and
then just finalize the thing with something like: find /bar/ -depth
-name .rsync-partial -exec rm -rf {} \;
I meant more like: -name .rsync-partial -prune -exec .
Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam wrote:
Makes sense. And
Michal Soltys wrote:
Either way - as a workaround, you could drop delete-excluded, and
then just finalize the thing with something like: find /bar/ -depth
-name .rsync-partial -exec rm -rf {} \;
I meant more like: -name .rsync-partial -prune -exec .
Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam
I have been using batch mode successfully. I try this using cygwin on a
PC with 3.0.4 version of rsync. The two PackageOlder dirs are identical
cygwin diff -r /home/bill/tmp/PackageB /home/bill/PackageB
cygwin rsync -vv --only-write-batch=/Temp/changeAtoB.rsync -rptO -L
--delete-delay
Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam wrote:
... then without -f 'R .rp/', dst/.rp is not removed. With -f 'R .rp/',
it is removed but if dst/a is updated then we have the same issue (exit
with code 23). This is entirely consistent with your strace i.e. code
23 whenever there are two separate
Try putting some additional line breaks at the end of your file. I am
not sure if this will solve your issues. Give it a go and report back
if this resolves the issue. Hope this helps
I decided the most secure way to deal with backup/firewall issues
between my
work and home was to encrypt
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:01 -0600, Roy F. Cabaniss wrote:
rsync -avl --stats --progress --timeout=300 --exclude-from
/home/foo/bin/exclude.txt /home /mnt/sdc2
Since there are, as with any backups, files I don't want to bother backing up
I created an exclude file and stored it in my bin.
Way back:
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003
09:56:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Rubel mrubel at
galcit.caltech.edu To: rsync at lists.samba.org Subject:
--link-dest when target and compare_dir both have file
Hi J.W. et al,
Kevin Everets was kind enough to
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:56:24PM +0100, Roman Fiedler wrote:
Hi list,
After reading rsync docu and doing online search, I still failed to find
a simple solution for following problem:
The goal is to sync two directories using rsync without running the
rsync daemon on one of the two
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Michal Soltys wrote:
but ... the dir is not there anymore, thus ENOENT
(due to opendir failing) and rsync's exit code 23.
Yeah, rsync always generates an error if the opendir() call fails in
send_directory(). The attached patch makes it treat a
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5974
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 07:58:55PM -0800, Bill Wendin wrote:
My comment: 2nd run hangs if all files are up-to-date.
You should either switch to the latest pre-release of 3.0.5 (which has
batch-mode fixes) or use --no-i-r.
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:22:42AM +1100, Robert Bell wrote:
we would like rsync to use a hard-link from ../backup.1 in
preference to a new copy from source/ to backup.0/ .
That's not something that I plan to implement. I'd suggest changing
your naming to always use a new directory, which will
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:58:05PM -0600, Larry Hayes wrote:
I have tried several other combinations of '\'' and single and double
quoting the entire path or just the filename, with no luck.
There's no such thing as quoting in an include/exclude file. Anything
after an initial -/+ and a space
Wayne,
Thanks for the prompt response.
The issue is around performance. We have a backup area containing 4.5M
inodes in each backup, of which around 0.5M to 1M are directories.
Backing up to a new directory each time is far slower than backing up to
an almost completely filled directory.
Matt,
Thanks for the info. Basically I want to display all the files which has not
transfer because the file has not changed. Can I use --info=skip for this?
Thanks,
Jignesh
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.netwrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 16:56 +0530,
15 matches
Mail list logo
