In , on 07/17/09
at 01:46 PM, Kurt Nelson said:
Hi Kurt,
Please reply to the list...
>Any good workarounds?
Depends on your needs. If you really need names this long, rsync builds
pretty easily. Change the pathname max to something you can live with
rsync should stop complaining. Look fo
In , on 07/17/09
at 12:16 AM, Kurtis Nelson said:
Hi,
>I have been using rsnapshot on OS X for a bit now to backup my debian
>home server to my external HD but have now started getting this error.
>ERROR: buffer overflow in recv_file_entry [generator]
>rsync error: error allocating core memo
Carlos Carvalho (car...@fisica.ufpr.br) wrote on 17 July 2009 02:13:
>Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 16 July 2009 20:59:
> >On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:48 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> >> What's the purpose of --partial-dir then? I thought it was leaving the
> >> partial trans
Hi,
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 17 Jul 2009, Jon Watson wrote:
I know this is a long shot, but I thought I would ask.
I think that if anything causes a kernel reboot, then that's more
interesting for the kernel people than for the people concerned with
whatever causes the reboot...
Paul
I
On Fri 17 Jul 2009, Jon Watson wrote:
>
> I know this is a long shot, but I thought I would ask.
I think that if anything causes a kernel reboot, then that's more
interesting for the kernel people than for the people concerned with
whatever causes the reboot...
Paul
--
Please use reply-all for
Hi All,
I know this is a long shot, but I thought I would ask.
We've been using a backup script which uses rsync for months now on a
Xen server without issue. A few weeks ago we had some work done on the
server which included upgrading the kernel. We are now running
2.6.18-128.1.10.el5xen and
Hello.
My problem is Rsync stops when I use it between 2 of my servers (2 NAS
Synology) ( named "*.22*" and "*.6*" ).
The problem continue...
For example :
_ Rsync run correctly between my server "*.22*" and ".6" ( in the 2
directions )
_ Rsync run correctly between my server ".6" and "*.8*" ( i
On Thu 16 Jul 2009, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 15:10 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> > Once two files are hard-linked, there is
>
> The log shows symlinks (->), not hard links (=>). Of course, your point
> stands.
I wish people would be more specific when talking about links