On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> So...what is the point of fixing the seed?
>
I'ts not really intended for normal use. It can help with some types of
debugging and other fringe uses.
Is there a "best solution" for caching checksums?
For use with user-changeable files (a
I'm trying to understand the point of the --checksum-seed option. As I
understand it from a little reading, checksums are not cached over
executions of rsync. So...what is the point of fixing the seed?
Is this in support of patches which *do* support caching of checksums?
I've read about cac
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8336
andras.porj...@ericsson.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WO
