On 02/17/2013 01:59:02 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> > It occurs to me that a handy solution might be to have an rsync
> option,
> > similar to the --exclude option, which would allow checksumming to
> happen
> > throughout most of the ackup
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> It occurs to me that a handy solution might be to have an rsync option,
> similar to the --exclude option, which would allow checksumming to happen
> throughout most of the ackup process but would do "regular" size/timestamp
> based backups
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Linda Walsh wrote:
I wondered about that as well -- could speed things
up by 30% over going through the slow linux buffers.
One thing that the 'dd' people found out though was
that if you do direct I/O, memory and your I/O really
do have to line up -- it may be that only 51
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Linda Walsh wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
> On 2/14/2013 9:50 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> > Since a --direct-io feature was requested a few times the past decade
> > with little response and the actual patch is quite trivial, I p
